Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Better handling of StringValueTransformers #49

Open
greenrd opened this issue Nov 22, 2012 · 0 comments
Open

Better handling of StringValueTransformers #49

greenrd opened this issue Nov 22, 2012 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@greenrd
Copy link
Contributor

greenrd commented Nov 22, 2012

Currently, if you forget to register a StringValueTransformer, you just get a default value of the type to be transformed for an argument of that type. This is undesirable.

@ghost ghost assigned greenrd Nov 22, 2012
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant