Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updated a broken link to UDUNITS examples of how to format units strings #373

Closed
JonathanGregory opened this issue Jun 27, 2023 · 4 comments · Fixed by #371
Closed

Updated a broken link to UDUNITS examples of how to format units strings #373

JonathanGregory opened this issue Jun 27, 2023 · 4 comments · Fixed by #371
Labels
defect Content mistake on the website

Comments

@JonathanGregory
Copy link
Contributor

@larsbarring has corrected a broken link in the FAQ to UDUNITS. His pull request will be merged if no-one objects in three weeks. Thanks, Lars.

@JonathanGregory JonathanGregory added the defect Content mistake on the website label Jun 27, 2023
@DocOtak
Copy link
Member

DocOtak commented Jun 29, 2023

Since this is a correction to the website faq and not one of the conventions documents, I don't think the 3 week wait applies to this. i.e. I think you can merge immediately

@JonathanGregory
Copy link
Contributor Author

@DocOtak, thanks for your comment. I believe the rules are actually unclear. They were being debated in issue 102, which isn't yet concluded. As far as I can see there and remember, we apply the three-week rule to changes on the website as well as the conventions, except for updates to the website that have been agreed to be made immediately by the governance panel.

@DocOtak
Copy link
Member

DocOtak commented Jun 29, 2023

@JonathanGregory I see. I think there is a category of changes, such as this one, that we should be able to move faster on but not sure quite how to articulate it. In this case, it is the same content, just the location/url moved, which is something that, despite what should happen, is fairly normal on the internet.

@JonathanGregory
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for your comment, @DocOtak. I agree we should consider the rules for website updates. There are outstanding issues about this. Jonathan

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
defect Content mistake on the website
Projects
None yet
2 participants