Fix utils.inspect
with custom object-returning inspect()s.
#173
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This code is lifted from the latest node utils.js: https://github.com/joyent/node/blob/896b2aa7074fc886efd7dd0a397d694763cac7ce/lib/util.js#L205-L209
Without it, if an object contains another object whose custom
inspect()
method returns a non-string,utils.inspect
gets confused and tries to dononString.indexOf
.This fixes chaijs/chai-as-promised#32, where Chai as Promised was trying to call
utils.inspect
on anAssertionError
which contained as its "actual" property a Q promise. Since Q promises have custominspect
methods that return objects, not strings, this was triggered.Would love a patch release with this soon :)