Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ppc64le] Remove P8 and P9 hack so tests pass for Power10 #3887

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mtarsel
Copy link

@mtarsel mtarsel commented Sep 19, 2024

008e04c and a6d7bbb added and used the libguestfs-ppc64le-wrapper.sh in order to address some failing tests on ppc64le. Using a Power10 machine with KVM enabled, tests are passing with this script removed. There was a successful test run with: cosa kola run --tag '!reprovision'

If we are going to use p10 for CI going forward, I think we can remove this script entirely. Otherwise, we will have to distinguish between p10 and not p10 or possibly implement a better way than relying on using uname -r output searching for el7.

Related to issue #2473

008e04c and a6d7bbb added and used the libguestfs-ppc64le-wrapper.sh in order to address some failing tests on ppc64le. Using a Power10 machine with KVM enabled, tests are passing with this script removed. There was a successful test run with: cosa kola run --tag '!reprovision'

Signed-off-by: Mick Tarsel <mtarsel@gmail.com>
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 19, 2024

Hi @mtarsel. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a coreos member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@marmijo
Copy link
Member

marmijo commented Sep 19, 2024

/ok-to-test

Copy link
Member

@jlebon jlebon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks sane to me. Though I'm still confused why you were hitting issues with this. Those paths shouldn't have triggered for you at all. Probably worth digging into that a bit more to understand better what went wrong there.

But anyway, I do also think that these patches are no longer relevant now. They predate the pipeline rework from a time when we were using a separate ppc64le OCP cluster, which is what I think was what was using RHEL7. Our current builders all use FCOS, so this will never trigger.

cc @ravanelli in case I'm missing something

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 19, 2024

@mtarsel: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/rhcos 4670959 link true /test rhcos
ci/prow/images 4670959 link true /test images

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@ravanelli
Copy link
Member

This looks sane to me. Though I'm still confused why you were hitting issues with this. Those paths shouldn't have triggered for you at all. Probably worth digging into that a bit more to understand better what went wrong there.

But anyway, I do also think that these patches are no longer relevant now. They predate the pipeline rework from a time when we were using a separate ppc64le OCP cluster, which is what I think was what was using RHEL7. Our current builders all use FCOS, so this will never trigger.

cc @ravanelli in case I'm missing something

I think we are ok in removing it, the main reason in the past was indeed the need for vsmt=8 + some other small changes for RHEL7 in our old ocp cluster. However, I agreed this code should not be running in P10 with another RHEL version.

@jlebon
Copy link
Member

jlebon commented Sep 27, 2024

LGTM. Can you fix the lint issues in the file you touched?

@mtarsel
Copy link
Author

mtarsel commented Sep 27, 2024

LGTM. Can you fix the lint issues in the file you touched?

sure thing. if im reading it correctly, it looks like I need to just remove the unused "unix" import

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants