This repository has been archived by the owner on May 16, 2023. It is now read-only.
FIx doc to reflect optional health authority involvement #703
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This addresses a part of corona-warn-app#701 i.e. corona-warn-app#701 (comment) by implicitly saying that it can also work _with_ health authorities while it can also work _without_ them. The claim that it never works without them is just no longer true since v2.9. This is the most simple (and subtle) way to address it. But it fixes the now wrong statement in the doc. Of course, the main issue to document the whole new feature with more technical details is still open.
rugk
changed the title
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This addresses a part of #701 i.e. #701 (comment) by implicitly saying that it can also work with health authorities while it can also work without them.
The claim that it never works without them is just no longer true since v2.9.
This is the most simple (and subtle) way to address it. But it fixes the now wrong statement in the doc.
Of course, the main issue to document the whole new feature with more technical details is still open.