Increase coverage for DecCoins #7031
Assignees
Labels
Comments
|
I decided to look at this, mainly as a way to familiarize myself with the codebase. I wanted to get a sense of what the current coverage was and found this useful: Taking it one step further, this highlights what isn't covered: |
8 tasks
19 tasks
mergify bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 26, 2021
<!-- The default pull request template is for types feat, fix, or refactor. For other templates, add one of the following parameters to the url: - template=docs.md - template=other.md --> ## Description Ref: #7031 <!-- Add a description of the changes that this PR introduces and the files that are the most critical to review. --> Note/todo : 1. Not sure if [this](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/spoorthi/7031-deccoins-adding-tests/types/dec_coin.go#L631) line is reachable. The condition is already checked in [this ](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/spoorthi/7031-deccoins-adding-tests/types/dec_coin.go#L618) line. Therefore, 100% coverage for `ParseDecCoin` function likely not possible 2. Clarification needed [here](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/spoorthi/7031-deccoins-adding-tests/types/dec_coin_test.go#L883-L884) 3. Clarification needed [here](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/spoorthi/7031-deccoins-adding-tests/types/dec_coin_test.go#L1124-L1125) --- ### Author Checklist *All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and please add links to any relevant follow up issues.* I have... - [x] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [ ] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [x] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting)) - [x] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification - [ ] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules) - [ ] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing) - [ ] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md` - [ ] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc) - [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification - [ ] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary - [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed ### Reviewers Checklist *All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.* I have... - [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed - [ ] reviewed state machine logic - [ ] reviewed API design and naming - [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate - [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage - [ ] manually tested (if applicable)
|
Fixed with #9752 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
During #7027 I noticed that there are a lot of
DecCoin(s)functions that don't have tests. It would be nice to increase coverage for them and refactor the tests to use table tests instead.cc: @clevinson @aaronc
For Admin Use
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: