fix: null guard for tx fee amounts (backport #10327) #10342
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![mergify[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/10562?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
## Description It is possible to submit a TX with a fees object containing a Coin with a nil amount. This results in a rather cryptic redacted panic response when the basic validation checks fee Coins for negative amounts. This PR adds an additional check for nil to provide a friendlier error message. --- ### Author Checklist *All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and please add links to any relevant follow up issues.* I have... - [x] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [ ] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [x] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting)) - [x] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification (note: No issue exists) - [x] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules) - [x] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing) (note: First PR against the SDK so please comment with what needs to be done) - [x] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md` - [x] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc) - [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification - [x] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary - [x] confirmed all CI checks have passed ### Reviewers Checklist *All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.* I have... - [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed - [ ] reviewed state machine logic - [ ] reviewed API design and naming - [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate - [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage - [ ] manually tested (if applicable) (cherry picked from commit 96e162b) # Conflicts: # CHANGELOG.md
tac0turtle
added
A:automerge
tac0turtle
approved these changes
Oct 12, 2021
amaury1093
approved these changes
Oct 12, 2021
evan-forbes
pushed a commit
to evan-forbes/cosmos-sdk
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 12, 2021
) * fix: null guard for tx fee amounts (cosmos#10327) ## Description It is possible to submit a TX with a fees object containing a Coin with a nil amount. This results in a rather cryptic redacted panic response when the basic validation checks fee Coins for negative amounts. This PR adds an additional check for nil to provide a friendlier error message. --- ### Author Checklist *All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and please add links to any relevant follow up issues.* I have... - [x] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [ ] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [x] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting)) - [x] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification (note: No issue exists) - [x] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules) - [x] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing) (note: First PR against the SDK so please comment with what needs to be done) - [x] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md` - [x] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc) - [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification - [x] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary - [x] confirmed all CI checks have passed ### Reviewers Checklist *All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.* I have... - [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed - [ ] reviewed state machine logic - [ ] reviewed API design and naming - [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate - [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage - [ ] manually tested (if applicable) (cherry picked from commit 96e162b) # Conflicts: # CHANGELOG.md * solve conflicts * move sections Co-authored-by: Alex Megalokonomos <alex.megalokonomos@tendermint.com> Co-authored-by: marbar3778 <marbar3778@yahoo.com>
evan-forbes
pushed a commit
to evan-forbes/cosmos-sdk
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 1, 2021
) * fix: null guard for tx fee amounts (cosmos#10327) ## Description It is possible to submit a TX with a fees object containing a Coin with a nil amount. This results in a rather cryptic redacted panic response when the basic validation checks fee Coins for negative amounts. This PR adds an additional check for nil to provide a friendlier error message. --- ### Author Checklist *All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and please add links to any relevant follow up issues.* I have... - [x] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [ ] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [x] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting)) - [x] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification (note: No issue exists) - [x] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules) - [x] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing) (note: First PR against the SDK so please comment with what needs to be done) - [x] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md` - [x] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc) - [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification - [x] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary - [x] confirmed all CI checks have passed ### Reviewers Checklist *All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.* I have... - [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed - [ ] reviewed state machine logic - [ ] reviewed API design and naming - [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate - [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage - [ ] manually tested (if applicable) (cherry picked from commit 96e162b) # Conflicts: # CHANGELOG.md * solve conflicts * move sections Co-authored-by: Alex Megalokonomos <alex.megalokonomos@tendermint.com> Co-authored-by: marbar3778 <marbar3778@yahoo.com>
19 tasks
JeancarloBarrios
pushed a commit
to agoric-labs/cosmos-sdk
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 28, 2024
) * fix: null guard for tx fee amounts (cosmos#10327) ## Description It is possible to submit a TX with a fees object containing a Coin with a nil amount. This results in a rather cryptic redacted panic response when the basic validation checks fee Coins for negative amounts. This PR adds an additional check for nil to provide a friendlier error message. --- ### Author Checklist *All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and please add links to any relevant follow up issues.* I have... - [x] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [ ] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [x] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting)) - [x] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification (note: No issue exists) - [x] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules) - [x] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing) (note: First PR against the SDK so please comment with what needs to be done) - [x] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md` - [x] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc) - [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification - [x] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary - [x] confirmed all CI checks have passed ### Reviewers Checklist *All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.* I have... - [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed - [ ] reviewed state machine logic - [ ] reviewed API design and naming - [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate - [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage - [ ] manually tested (if applicable) (cherry picked from commit 96e162b) # Conflicts: # CHANGELOG.md * solve conflicts * move sections Co-authored-by: Alex Megalokonomos <alex.megalokonomos@tendermint.com> Co-authored-by: marbar3778 <marbar3778@yahoo.com>
This was referenced Oct 13, 2024
Closed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is an automatic backport of pull request #10327 done by Mergify.
Cherry-pick of 96e162b has failed:
To fix up this pull request, you can check it out locally. See documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/github/collaborating-with-pull-requests/reviewing-changes-in-pull-requests/checking-out-pull-requests-locally
Mergify commands and options
More conditions and actions can be found in the documentation.
You can also trigger Mergify actions by commenting on this pull request:
@Mergifyio refreshwill re-evaluate the rules@Mergifyio rebasewill rebase this PR on its base branch@Mergifyio updatewill merge the base branch into this PR@Mergifyio backport <destination>will backport this PR on<destination>branchAdditionally, on Mergify dashboard you can:
Finally, you can contact us on https://mergify.io/