Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: checkout with app-token (dependabot-update-all) #22612

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 26, 2024

Conversation

auricom
Copy link
Contributor

@auricom auricom commented Nov 21, 2024

Description

#22563 - Tries to fix Tests / Code coverage not running on commits done by Dependabot Update All Go Modules workflow.

As it seems that PRBOT_PAT is not working anymore with #22545 ; this method is generating token on-the-fly using cosmos-renovate-app GithubApp.

image

⚠️ This app must be configured on the cosmos/cosmos-sdk before this PR to be merged.


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the Dependabot workflow to include a new step for generating a GitHub App token for secure authentication.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 21, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the workflow file .github/workflows/dependabot-update-all.yml by adding a new step to generate a GitHub App token. This step uses the actions/create-github-app-token action, which is executed before the checkout step. The token is generated using the APP_ID and APP_PRIVATE_KEY from the repository secrets, enabling Dependabot to securely access the repository during the workflow.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.github/workflows/dependabot-update-all.yml Added a step to generate a GitHub App token using actions/create-github-app-token before checkout.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

Type: CI

Suggested reviewers

  • tac0turtle
  • julienrbrt
  • akhilkumarpilli

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f74a9f6 and bf59773.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/dependabot-update-all.yml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/dependabot-update-all.yml (3)

26-26: LGTM: Token usage in checkout step is secure

The generated token is correctly passed to the checkout step using the outputs context from the token generation step.


16-21: Verify the GitHub App token generation setup

The implementation looks correct, but there are a few important points to verify:

  1. Ensure that the cosmos-renovate-app has been properly configured in the cosmos/cosmos-sdk repository
  2. Verify that the required secrets (APP_ID and APP_PRIVATE_KEY) are properly set in the repository settings

Line range hint 8-11: Consider adding error handling for PR title parsing

The workflow relies heavily on parsing the PR title in the Extract updated dependency step. Consider adding error handling or validation to ensure the PR title follows the expected format to prevent potential workflow failures.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Member

@julienrbrt julienrbrt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK, have the permissions already been updated?

@julienrbrt julienrbrt added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 25, 2024
@julienrbrt julienrbrt removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a manual request Nov 25, 2024
@julienrbrt julienrbrt added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 26, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 923613d Nov 26, 2024
77 checks passed
@julienrbrt julienrbrt deleted the claude/dependabot-update-all branch November 26, 2024 02:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants