From 5c0c5bea1cc90a3e27cb0ae545325baed7e09d7c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eric Niebler <eniebler@boost.org>
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2025 08:11:03 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Fix function type name in [exec.let]

The specification of `let_value(sndr,fn)` and friends refers to the type of `fn` as "`Fn`". But when introducing the types, we give it the name "`F`". This fixes the inconsistency.
---
 source/exec.tex | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/source/exec.tex b/source/exec.tex
index 99ea7b1f2e..4757685bae 100644
--- a/source/exec.tex
+++ b/source/exec.tex
@@ -3536,7 +3536,7 @@
 Given a type \tcode{Tag} and a pack \tcode{Args},
 let \exposid{as-sndr2} be an alias template
 such that \tcode{\exposid{as-sndr2}<Tag(Args...)>} denotes
-the type \tcode{\exposid{call-result-t}<Fn, decay_t<Args>\&...>}.
+the type \tcode{\exposid{call-result-t}<F, decay_t<Args>\&...>}.
 Then \tcode{ops2_variant_t} denotes
 the type
 \begin{codeblock}