Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Schemas in src/resources/org/jpeek/xsd must be documented #134

Closed
skapral opened this issue Jan 31, 2018 · 18 comments
Closed

Schemas in src/resources/org/jpeek/xsd must be documented #134

skapral opened this issue Jan 31, 2018 · 18 comments

Comments

@skapral
Copy link
Contributor

skapral commented Jan 31, 2018

Subj. First discussed in #133. We need to document the schemas in src/resources/org/jpeek/xsd so that the semantics of the generated XML documents is transparent for maintainers.

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Jan 31, 2018

@yegor256/z please, pay attention to this issue

@yegor256 yegor256 added the bug label Jan 31, 2018
@0crat 0crat added the scope label Jan 31, 2018
@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Jan 31, 2018

Job #134 is now in scope, role is DEV

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Jan 31, 2018

Bug was reported, see §29: +15 points just awarded to @skapral/z, total is +90

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Feb 15, 2018

The job #134 assigned to @llorllale/z, here is why. The budget is 30 minutes, see §4. Please, read §8 and §9. If the task is not clear, read this and this.

@llorllale
Copy link
Contributor

@skapral documentation of skeleton.xsd was done in #189 and puzzles left for metric.xsd, matrix.xsd, and index.xsd (#201, #200, and #199 respectively)

can we close this?

@skapral
Copy link
Contributor Author

skapral commented Feb 19, 2018

ok

@skapral skapral closed this as completed Feb 19, 2018
@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Feb 19, 2018

@ypshenychka/z please review this job, as in §30

@ypshenychka
Copy link

@0crat quality good

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Feb 19, 2018

QA review completed: +15 points just awarded to @ypshenychka/z, total is +105

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Feb 19, 2018

Order was successfully finished: +35 points just awarded to @llorllale/z, total is +605

@yegor256
Copy link
Member

@0crat status

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Feb 19, 2018

@0crat status (here)

@yegor256 This is what I know about this job, as in §32:

@0pdd
Copy link
Collaborator

0pdd commented Dec 17, 2018

@skapral 3 puzzles #200, #201, #282 are still not solved; solved: #199.

@0pdd
Copy link
Collaborator

0pdd commented Jan 11, 2019

@skapral 2 puzzles #200, #282 are still not solved; solved: #199, #201.

@0pdd
Copy link
Collaborator

0pdd commented Oct 6, 2019

@skapral the puzzle #200 is still not solved; solved: #199, #201, #282.

@0pdd
Copy link
Collaborator

0pdd commented Feb 5, 2021

@skapral the puzzle #505 is still not solved.

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Feb 5, 2021

@0crat status (here)

@yegor256 This is what I know about this job in C7JGJ00DP, as in §32:

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Feb 5, 2021

@0crat quality good (here)

@ypshenychka You @ypshenychka/z need to have one of these roles in order to do "Complete QA review": ARC, QA; I'm sorry to say this, but at the moment you've got no roles in this project

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants