Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

#481 - Pass metric name via constructor. #485

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

vzurauskas
Copy link
Contributor

PR for #481

Passing metric name via constructor to fit the Calculus interface to Java implementations.

@vzurauskas
Copy link
Contributor Author

@paulodamaso Can you check why no reviewer has been assigned?

@paulodamaso
Copy link
Collaborator

@0crat in

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Sep 19, 2020

@0crat in (here)

@paulodamaso Job #485 is already in scope

@paulodamaso
Copy link
Collaborator

@0crat status

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Sep 19, 2020

@0crat status (here)

@paulodamaso This is what I know about this job in C7JGJ00DP, as in §32:

  • The job #485 is in scope for 2mon
  • The role is REV
  • The job is not assigned to anyone
  • The budget is not set yet
  • These users are banned and won't be assigned:
  • Job footprint (restricted area)

@paulodamaso
Copy link
Collaborator

@rultor merge

@rultor
Copy link
Collaborator

rultor commented Oct 31, 2020

@rultor merge

@paulodamaso OK, I'll try to merge now. You can check the progress of the merge here

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Oct 31, 2020

There is an unrecoverable failure on my side. Please, submit it here:

PID: 4@9ca55d38-31cb-44eb-9fbd-eb71fd9e124a, thread: pool-134-thread-1
com.zerocracy.radars.github.GhProject[69] com.zerocracy.radars.github.GhProjectNotFoundException: Github project for 'cqfn/jpeek' repo was not found

0.54.5: Issue: #485, Comment: 695219680

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Oct 31, 2020

There is an unrecoverable failure on my side. Please, submit it here:

PID: 4@9ca55d38-31cb-44eb-9fbd-eb71fd9e124a, thread: pool-135-thread-1
com.zerocracy.radars.github.GhProject[69] com.zerocracy.radars.github.GhProjectNotFoundException: Github project for 'cqfn/jpeek' repo was not found

0.54.5: Issue: #485, Comment: 695220632

@rultor
Copy link
Collaborator

rultor commented Oct 31, 2020

@rultor merge

@paulodamaso @vzurauskas Oops, I failed. You can see the full log here (spent 16s)

+ set -e
+ set -o pipefail
++ dirname ./run.sh
+ cd .
+ echo 31725
+ echo '1.69.1 839260fab'
1.69.1 839260fab
+ date
Sat Oct 31 16:31:22 CET 2020
+ uptime
 16:31:22 up 34 days,  1:37,  0 users,  load average: 1.09, 0.67, 0.34
+ cat
.rultor.yml in yegor256/home doesn't allow cqfn/jpeek to use its assets (there are 108 friends), see http://doc.rultor.com/reference.html#assets
+ exit -1
'cid' file is absent, container wasn't started correctly

@paulodamaso
Copy link
Collaborator

@rultor merge

@rultor
Copy link
Collaborator

rultor commented Jan 11, 2021

@rultor merge

@paulodamaso OK, I'll try to merge now. You can check the progress of the merge here

@rultor
Copy link
Collaborator

rultor commented Jan 11, 2021

@rultor merge

@paulodamaso @vzurauskas Oops, I failed. You can see the full log here (spent 16s)

+ set -e
+ set -o pipefail
++ dirname ./run.sh
+ cd .
+ echo 406
+ echo '1.69.1 839260fab'
1.69.1 839260fab
+ date
Mon Jan 11 21:43:12 CET 2021
+ uptime
 21:43:12 up 106 days,  6:49,  0 users,  load average: 0.16, 0.33, 0.23
+ cat
.rultor.yml in yegor256/home doesn't allow cqfn/jpeek to use its assets (there are 108 friends), see http://doc.rultor.com/reference.html#assets
+ exit -1
'cid' file is absent, container wasn't started correctly

@paulodamaso
Copy link
Collaborator

@yegor256 could you please fix this? Seems that renaming the repo messed with some asset permissions in yegor256/home

@@ -171,123 +170,122 @@ public void analyze() throws IOException {
final XSL chain = new XSLChain(layers);
this.save(skeleton.toString(), "skeleton.xml");
final Collection<Report> reports = new LinkedList<>();
final Calculus xsl = new XslCalculus();
if (this.params.containsKey("LCOM")) {
Copy link
Member

@baudoliver7 baudoliver7 Feb 5, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@vzurauskas Why not use an iteration on snippet :

if (this.params.containsKey(code)) {
    reports.add(
        new XslReport(
            chain.transform(skeleton), new XslCalculus(code),
             new ReportData(code, this.params, mean, sigma)
        )
    );
}

with code, mean and sigma some parameters. You could use mean and sigma default values where it appears only two parameters in ReportData constructor. You can also create a todo for that if you want.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@baudoliver7 That is a good suggestion, however this PR has been blocked for a very long time and I no longer have the time to work on it (at least in the near future). You can take it over if you want.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@vzurauskas Ok. But how can I do that ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@baudoliver7 You can ask @paulodamaso to assign this task to you and then copy this branch.

yegor256 added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2021
@yegor256
Copy link
Member

yegor256 commented Feb 5, 2021

@paulodamaso done in 18efdff

@baudoliver7
Copy link
Member

@paulodamaso could you assign to me this PR ? I want to do some few changes on it.

@baudoliver7
Copy link
Member

@paulodamaso ping

@vzurauskas vzurauskas closed this Mar 31, 2023
@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Mar 31, 2023

Job gh:cqfn/jpeek#485 is not assigned, can't get performer

@0crat 0crat removed the 0crat/scope label Apr 6, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants