-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 373
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Refactor and simplify code to not use Data.Has #903
Conversation
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ mutator Deletion = deleteRandList | |||
selectAndMutate :: MonadRandom m | |||
=> ([Tx] -> m [Tx]) -> Corpus -> m [Tx] | |||
selectAndMutate f ctxs = do | |||
rtxs <- weighted $ map (\(i, txs) -> (txs, fromInteger i)) $ DS.toDescList ctxs | |||
rtxs <- weighted $ map (\(i, txs) -> (txs, fromIntegral i)) $ DS.toDescList ctxs |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why this was changed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I changed Integer
to Int
in the Corpus type type Corpus = Set (Int, [Tx])
as we don't need an unbounded Integer there.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great
lib/Echidna/Transaction.hs
Outdated
return a | ||
|
||
-- | Transform an EVM action from HEVM to our MonadState VM | ||
fromEVM :: MonadState VM m => EVM a -> m a |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we move this to a different file?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what about moving it to Echidna.Types
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sounds good.
We've been using
Data.Has
extensively and it's been a significant pattern in our code. While it allows for more abstract code to be written, it's not a commonly used library and it comes at a cost of substantial mental load as it was often hard to understand what the code is doing.This PR removes all
Data.Has
from our code and replaces it with more common patterns, in the hope to improve the project's maintenance and development.I also enabled the
OverloadedRecordDot
extension that comes with GHC 9.2 that somewhat fixes the records so they can be accessed like in "normal" languages 😄.