Skip to content

Conversation

@samtrion
Copy link
Member

@samtrion samtrion commented Nov 20, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Added two unit tests covering empty-collection handling for the null-or-empty guard (including an async variant).
    • Introduced an async test using directive to support async assertions.
    • Expanded test data providers to better validate enumerable edge cases and expected failures.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@samtrion samtrion self-assigned this Nov 20, 2025
@samtrion samtrion added state:ready for merge Indicates that a pull request has been reviewed and approved, and is ready to be merged into the mai type:chore Indicates some housework that needs to be done. labels Nov 20, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 20, 2025

Walkthrough

Added two new unit tests to verify ThrowIfNullOrEmpty behavior for IEnumerable inputs and introduced a using directive for async Task support. No production code changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Unit tests (single file)
tests/NetEvolve.Arguments.Tests.Unit/ArgumentTests_ThrowIfNullOrEmpty.cs
Added two test methods: ThrowIfNullOrEmpty_WhenIEnumerableEmpty_ThrowsArgumentException(IEnumerable<string>? argument) (uses ThrowIfNullOrEmptyEnumerableData) and ThrowIfNullOrEmpty_WhenIEnumerableEmpty_Expected(IEnumerable<string>? argument) (uses ThrowIfNullOrEmptyEnumerableWithData and runs async assertions). Also added using System.Threading.Tasks;.

Sequence Diagram(s)

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

  • Single test file changed; low complexity.
  • Pay attention to:
    • Which exception type is asserted (ArgumentException vs ArgumentNullException).
    • Proper use of the provided data sources (ThrowIfNullOrEmptyEnumerableData vs ThrowIfNullOrEmptyEnumerableWithData).
    • Async test signature and the newly added using System.Threading.Tasks;.

Poem

🐇 I nibble on tests, a carrot of code,

Empty lists caught on the bright rabbit road.
New assertions hop in, tidy and spry,
Async hops added — a cheerful small cry.

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately and concisely describes the main change: adding extended tests for the ThrowIfNullOrEmpty method, which matches the changeset of adding new test cases.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch test/added-missing-test

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Knowledge base: Disabled due to Reviews -> Disable Knowledge Base setting

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1ff3705 and 7bc9d5e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/NetEvolve.Arguments.Tests.Unit/ArgumentTests_ThrowIfNullOrEmpty.cs (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • tests/NetEvolve.Arguments.Tests.Unit/ArgumentTests_ThrowIfNullOrEmpty.cs

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
tests/NetEvolve.Arguments.Tests.Unit/ArgumentTests_ThrowIfNullOrEmpty.cs (1)

61-70: Consider adding test coverage for non-empty IEnumerable (success case).

The test suite now covers null IEnumerable (line 49) and empty IEnumerable (line 61), but lacks coverage for non-empty IEnumerable that should succeed without throwing. The string tests include this success case (lines 36-46). According to the summary, ThrowIfNullOrEmptyEnumerableWithData was removed, which appears to have provided this coverage.

Consider adding a parameterized test for the success case to maintain symmetry with the string tests:

[Test]
[MethodDataSource(nameof(ThrowIfNullOrEmptyEnumerableWithData))]
public async Task ThrowIfNullOrEmpty_WhenIEnumerableNotEmpty_ReturnsArgument(IEnumerable<string> argument)
{
    // Act
    var result = Argument.ThrowIfNullOrEmpty(argument);

    // Assert
    _ = await Assert.That(result).IsNotNull();
}

public static IEnumerable<IEnumerable<string>> ThrowIfNullOrEmptyEnumerableWithData =>
    [new[] { "argument" }, new List<string> { "argument" }, new HashSet<string> { "argument" }];
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Knowledge base: Disabled due to Reviews -> Disable Knowledge Base setting

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7755da5 and 1ff3705.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/NetEvolve.Arguments.Tests.Unit/ArgumentTests_ThrowIfNullOrEmpty.cs (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Build & Tests / Run Tests / Testing .NET solution

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 20, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 96.29%. Comparing base (7755da5) to head (7bc9d5e).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #393       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   77.77%   96.29%   +18.51%     
===========================================
  Files          11       11               
  Lines          27       27               
  Branches        2        2               
===========================================
+ Hits           21       26        +5     
+ Misses          5        1        -4     
+ Partials        1        0        -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@samtrion samtrion merged commit 6612fb6 into main Nov 20, 2025
12 checks passed
@samtrion samtrion deleted the test/added-missing-test branch November 20, 2025 15:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

state:ready for merge Indicates that a pull request has been reviewed and approved, and is ready to be merged into the mai type:chore Indicates some housework that needs to be done.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants