docs: add content describing diff between datahub and acryl datahub #10301
Conversation
|
|
||
| ## How to read this list | ||
|
|
||
| Not a fan of checkboxes? Neither are we. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Totally agree that checkboxes would be bland here, but the current styling is pretty tough to read. At a glance, they look like previously-visited hyperlinks; it's also really hard to see in dark mode:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Also, while scrolling down, it's hard to keep the mental model of which color maps to which - by the time I got here, I couldn't easily synthesize which was DataHub vs. Acryl DataHub:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can we work with the Design team to create some static images so we're not limited to markdown formatting?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Agree, it's somewhat hard to understand this comparsion intuitively. I don't think it would be too crazy to use markdown table with checkboxes, something like this ; https://datahubproject.io/docs/api/datahub-apis#datahub-api-comparison
If the design is too bland we can do something like the table on a acryl website ; https://www.acryldata.io/
Yet i'm not a big fan of static images becuase the text wouldn't be searchable.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Also, i think we wouldnt need "How to read this list" if we go with the checkboxes. @shirshanka let me know if you need help with this.
|
Addressed review comments. PTAL @yoonhyejin |
Co-authored-by: Hyejin Yoon <0327jane@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Hyejin Yoon <0327jane@gmail.com>
…atahub-project#10301) Co-authored-by: Hyejin Yoon <0327jane@gmail.com>
Checklist