You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If a full shave build passes, and then fails on the next build (but sphinx still runs), try to include the last-known-good build on all future failing builds.
motivation
On both GitHub Pages and ReadTheDocs, once a build is overwritten, it's gone. As we collect and re-report shave failures as a best-effort human-readable site, this means a previously-working, and still inspect-able product might be overwritten with boring error messages.
design ideas
At the end of a full shave, jupyter lite archive makes an npm-compatible tarball, currently always with the name work/dist/lite/lite-jupyterlite.tgz, which also gets uploaded to the host, e.g.
It may also be desirable to include the "version" (e.g. PR number), e.g.
_static/work/lite/jupyak-{:pr-number}.tgz
Any further information (e.g. git hash, info about the repos) is likely not a good idea, though more information (such as build logs) could easily be brought over in a similar manner without changing the lite archive, a useful artifact in its own right.
Based on state of the work folder, and well-known environment variables, a failing sweep-up job can:
derive the URL of a previous success (or previous pulled-along failure)
check if it exists
download it
extract it into e.g. work/dist/last-known-good/
copy itself into it
point to it in e.g. the build info sidebar in the HTML site
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
elevator pitch
If a full
shave
build passes, and then fails on the next build (butsphinx
still runs), try to include the last-known-good build on all future failing builds.motivation
On both GitHub Pages and ReadTheDocs, once a build is overwritten, it's gone. As we collect and re-report
shave
failures as a best-effort human-readable site, this means a previously-working, and still inspect-able product might be overwritten with boring error messages.design ideas
At the end of a full
shave
,jupyter lite archive
makes annpm
-compatible tarball, currently always with the namework/dist/lite/lite-jupyterlite.tgz
, which also gets uploaded to the host, e.g.https://deathbeds.github.io/jupyak/_static/work/lite/lite-jupyterlite.tgz
https://jupyak--{:pr-number}.org.readthedocs.build/en/16/_static/work/lite/lite-jupyterlite.tgz
It may also be desirable to include the "version" (e.g. PR number), e.g.
_static/work/lite/jupyak-{:pr-number}.tgz
Any further information (e.g. git hash, info about the repos) is likely not a good idea, though more information (such as build logs) could easily be brought over in a similar manner without changing the lite archive, a useful artifact in its own right.
Based on state of the
work
folder, and well-known environment variables, a failing sweep-up job can:work/dist/last-known-good/
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: