Skip to content

Improve UT coverage #264

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
niranjan-n1 wants to merge 0 commits into from
Closed

Improve UT coverage #264

niranjan-n1 wants to merge 0 commits into from

Conversation

@niranjan-n1
Copy link
Contributor

@niranjan-n1 niranjan-n1 commented Feb 6, 2025 •
edited by chaganti-rajitha
Loading

Description

Increasing UT coverage to 90%

GitHub Issues

List the GitHub issues impacted by this PR:

GitHub Issue #

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code to ensure there are no formatting, vetting, linting, or security issues
  • I have verified that new and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • I have not allowed coverage numbers to degenerate
  • I have maintained at least 90% code coverage
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Backward compatibility is not broken

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration

  • Test A
  • Test B

@chaganti-rajitha chaganti-rajitha marked this pull request as ready for review February 27, 2025 13:01
@donatwork
Copy link
Contributor

donatwork commented Feb 27, 2025

There are unverified commits. This branch should be merged to a new branch and the commit signed. The use that branch for the PR.

@satyakonduri
Copy link
Contributor

satyakonduri commented Feb 28, 2025

New PR: #271

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@alikdell alikdell alikdell approved these changes

@anandrajak1 anandrajak1 anandrajak1 approved these changes

@atye atye Awaiting requested review from atye

@anathoodell anathoodell Awaiting requested review from anathoodell

@chimanjain chimanjain Awaiting requested review from chimanjain

@HarishH-DELL HarishH-DELL Awaiting requested review from HarishH-DELL

@nitesh3108 nitesh3108 Awaiting requested review from nitesh3108

@alexemc alexemc Awaiting requested review from alexemc

@rajendraindukuri rajendraindukuri Awaiting requested review from rajendraindukuri

@shaynafinocchiaro shaynafinocchiaro Awaiting requested review from shaynafinocchiaro

@panigs7 panigs7 Awaiting requested review from panigs7

+1 more reviewer

@EvgenyUglov EvgenyUglov EvgenyUglov approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@niranjan-n1 @donatwork @satyakonduri @alikdell @EvgenyUglov @anandrajak1