Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update CortexXDRIR.yml #34843

Merged
merged 25 commits into from
Jul 23, 2024
Merged

Update CortexXDRIR.yml #34843

merged 25 commits into from
Jul 23, 2024

Conversation

ShirleyDenkberg
Copy link
Contributor

Contributing to Cortex XSOAR Content

Make sure to register your contribution by filling the contribution registration form

The Pull Request will be reviewed only after the contribution registration form is filled.

Status

  • In Progress
  • Ready
  • In Hold - (Reason for hold)

Related Issues

fixes: link to the issue

Description

A few sentences describing the overall goals of the pull request's commits.

Must have

  • Tests
  • Documentation

@ShirleyDenkberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

ShirleyDenkberg commented Jun 13, 2024

@JasBeilin
Following are several questions for the yml file:

  • Line 48 - What integration doc are you referring to? Perhaps there should be a link here.

  • Line 642 - Is the only valid value True? What about False?

  • Line 1831 - what is the format of the date?

  • Line 2228 - Is this still true? Will this soon be deprecated?

  • Line 2277 -is this description correct

    PaloAltoNetworksXDR.ScriptResult.results.endpoint_name
    description: Number of successfully retrieved files.
    
  • Line 2412 - is this description correct

    PaloAltoNetworksXDR.ScriptResult.results.endpoint_name
    description: Number of successfully retrieved files.
    
  • Line 2851 - emitted or omitted?

    contextPath: PaloAltoNetworksXDR.OriginalAlert.event.resource_type
    description: The normalized type of the service that emitted the log row.
    
  • Line 2854 - emitted or omitted?

    contextPath: PaloAltoNetworksXDR.OriginalAlert.event.resource_type_orig
    description: The type of the service that omitted the log as provided by the cloud provider.
    
  • Line 2862 - emitted or omitted?

    contextPath: PaloAltoNetworksXDR.OriginalAlert.event.region
    description: The cloud region of the resource that emitted the log.
    type: String
    contextPath: PaloAltoNetworksXDR.OriginalAlert.event.zone
    description: The availability zone of the resource that emitted the log.
    
  • Line 3419 - is there a period or underscore missing from the context path?

    contextPath: PaloAltoNetworksXDR.RiskyHost.reasons.date created
    description: Date when the incident was created.
    

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 13, 2024

Coverage

Coverage Report
FileStmtsMissCoverMissing
Packs/CortexXDR/Integrations/CortexXDRIR
   CortexXDRIR.py6448786%59, 67, 71–73, 144–145, 206–210, 212, 215, 218, 222, 248–252, 254, 261–264, 275, 278, 281, 287, 290, 316, 321, 329, 331, 334–338, 340, 423–428, 477, 515, 530–531, 548, 558, 618, 621, 648, 655, 657, 734–735, 737, 790, 972–974, 977, 980, 985, 1020, 1028, 1051, 1079–1080, 1131, 1140, 1142–1144, 1147, 1150–1151, 1188–1191, 1223, 1240
TOTAL6448786% 

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
243 0 💤 0 ❌ 0 🔥 14.393s ⏱️

@ShirleyDenkberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

ShirleyDenkberg commented Jun 13, 2024

@JasBeilin
Comments on the Description File:
After Step 3 - Need to add a step to select a role. How do they know what role to select?
Do they need to do anything in the Components section?
Step 4 - Copy and paste the key - Where should I copy the key to?

@ShirleyDenkberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

@JasBeilin
Regarding the Pack Readme - At one time we were told to include a screenshot of one of the playbooks in the pack. Then that decision was reversed. I am not sure if we should have the playbook screenshot in the pack readme. Who makes this final decision?

@BEAdi BEAdi added the Contribution Thank you! Contributions are always welcome! label Jun 20, 2024
@BEAdi BEAdi self-assigned this Jun 20, 2024
@BEAdi BEAdi requested a review from Shellyber June 20, 2024 08:14
@BEAdi BEAdi removed the request for review from Shellyber June 20, 2024 09:10
@JasBeilin JasBeilin removed their request for review June 23, 2024 07:33
@BEAdi BEAdi assigned thefrieddan1 and unassigned BEAdi Jun 26, 2024
@maimorag
Copy link
Contributor

maimorag commented Jul 3, 2024

Hey @ShirleyDenkberg

line 48- the reference is to the README file line 132
line 648- added false
line 1832 - ISO 8601, added to doc.
line 2228- not sure, will ask tpm( Natalya Dalid)/
line 2277- fixed description
line 2407 - fixed
line 2851, 2854, 2854- emitted
line 3419- underscore, fixed

@maimorag
Copy link
Contributor

maimorag commented Jul 3, 2024

Description File -
step 3- role according to your permissions.
step 4- after generating the key a window is opened with the key (I sent an example via Slack)

README- I asked TPM, and post here as soon as I'll get an answer.

Thanks!

@maimorag
Copy link
Contributor

maimorag commented Jul 10, 2024

Update:

  1. regarding the "Soon to be deprecated command" - TPM will open a ticket to deprecate it, thanks.
    https://jira-dc.paloaltonetworks.com/browse/CIAC-11109
  2. screen shot- it ok it's there

@DeanArbel DeanArbel merged commit 3bb3426 into master Jul 23, 2024
13 checks passed
@DeanArbel DeanArbel deleted the ShirleyDenkberg-patch-1 branch July 23, 2024 14:05
@michal-dagan michal-dagan added the ForceMerge Forcing the merge of the PR despite the build status label Jul 30, 2024
xsoar-bot pushed a commit to xsoar-contrib/content that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2024
* Update CortexXDRIR.yml

* Update CortexXDRIR_description.md

* fixed cr

* fixed pre-commit

* fix

* fix

* reverting BC failure

* Documentation.
Version bump.

* yml format.

* Bump docker version.

* Bump docker version

* Bump pack from version CortexXDR to 6.1.56.

---------

Co-authored-by: maimorag <mmorag@paloaltonetworks.com>
Co-authored-by: Danny Fried <dfried@paloaltonetworks.com>
Co-authored-by: Content Bot <bot@demisto.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Contribution Thank you! Contributions are always welcome! docs-approved ForceMerge Forcing the merge of the PR despite the build status
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants