-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.2k
Add regression test for Interlocked.Exchange with nullable types #80796
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
CyrusNajmabadi
merged 6 commits into
main
from
copilot/fix-interlocked-exchange-nullability
Oct 23, 2025
Merged
Add regression test for Interlocked.Exchange with nullable types #80796
CyrusNajmabadi
merged 6 commits into
main
from
copilot/fix-interlocked-exchange-nullability
Oct 23, 2025
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Co-authored-by: CyrusNajmabadi <4564579+CyrusNajmabadi@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot
AI
changed the title
[WIP] Fix Interlocked.Exchange handling of nullable types
Add regression test for Interlocked.Exchange with nullable types
Oct 17, 2025
Copilot finished work on behalf of
CyrusNajmabadi
October 17, 2025 12:32
src/Compilers/CSharp/Test/Semantic/Semantics/MethodTypeInferenceTests.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/Compilers/CSharp/Test/Semantic/Semantics/MethodTypeInferenceTests.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
01afe51 to
ef679f4
Compare
src/Compilers/CSharp/Test/Semantic/Semantics/MethodTypeInferenceTests.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/Compilers/CSharp/Test/Semantic/Semantics/MethodTypeInferenceTests.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/Compilers/CSharp/Test/Semantic/Semantics/MethodTypeInferenceTests.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Member
|
@dotnet/roslyn-compiler ptal |
jjonescz
approved these changes
Oct 23, 2025
src/Compilers/CSharp/Test/Semantic/Semantics/MethodTypeInferenceTests.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…ceTests.cs Co-authored-by: Jan Jones <janjones@microsoft.com>
333fred
added a commit
to 333fred/roslyn
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 24, 2025
* upstream/main: (332 commits) Cache lambdas in analyzer driver (dotnet#80759) Add information for NuGet package version 4.14 (dotnet#80870) Add missing search keywords to VB Advanced options page Fix IDE0031 false positive when preprocessor directives are used in if statements (dotnet#80878) Use core compiler on netfx hosts with toolset package (dotnet#80631) Make string concat assert more precise (dotnet#80619) Extensions: address some diagnostic quality issues (dotnet#80827) Add note on traversal order for bound nodes (dotnet#80872) Ensure that locals at the top level of a constructor have the same safe-context as parameters (dotnet#80807) Fix handling of SymbolDisplayCompilerInternalOptions.UseArityForGenericTypes option for non-native symbol implementations (dotnet#80826) Update src/Analyzers/CSharp/Tests/UseCollectionInitializer/UseCollectionInitializerTests.cs Add IsValidContainingStatement check to prevent collection initializers in using declarations Add back old DocumentSpan constructor (dotnet#80864) Add tests verifying pointer types in type parameters require unsafe context (dotnet#80776) Add regression test for Interlocked.Exchange with nullable types (dotnet#80796) Add regression test for ParseAttributeArgumentList with invalid input (fixes dotnet#8699) (dotnet#80705) Add regression test for compiler crash with syntax error in indexer declaration (dotnet#80772) Add runtime NullReferenceException validation to foreach null iteration tests (dotnet#80839) Update MicrosoftBuildTasksCoreVersionForMetrics to 17.11.48 (dotnet#80812) Mark CS4009 error as a "build only" error. (dotnet#80698) ...
This was referenced Oct 25, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds a regression test to verify that
Interlocked.Exchangecorrectly handles nullable reference types without requiring explicit type parameters.Background
Previously, the compiler would incorrectly report CS8625 ("Cannot convert null literal to non-nullable reference type") when using
Interlocked.Exchangewith nullable custom types:However, the same code worked fine with
object?:The issue has since been fixed (likely as part of improvements to null literal type inference for generic methods mentioned in #43536), but there was no test coverage to prevent regression.
Changes
This PR adds a comprehensive test
InterlockedExchangeWithNullableTypesinMethodTypeInferenceTests.csthat:Interlocked.Exchangeworks correctly with bothobject?and custom nullable typesThe test validates that all three scenarios work correctly:
Interlocked.Exchange(ref object?, null)Interlocked.Exchange(ref class2?, null)(the previously broken case)Interlocked.Exchange<class2?>(ref class2?, null)(explicit type parameter workaround)This test will prevent any future regressions and can be used to close the original issue.
Original prompt
Fixes #49525
💬 Share your feedback on Copilot coding agent for the chance to win a $200 gift card! Click here to start the survey.