Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[wasm] Consider not AOT'ing Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.dll to reduce resource usage #67153

Open
radical opened this issue Mar 25, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

[wasm] Consider not AOT'ing Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.dll to reduce resource usage #67153

radical opened this issue Mar 25, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
arch-wasm WebAssembly architecture area-Build-mono
Milestone
Future

Comments

@radical
Copy link
Member

radical commented Mar 25, 2022

Context: #67017 (comment)

#67017 adds new jobs to AOT some library tests, that need lot of memory, on the build machine instead of helix.

cc @vargaz @lewing
@radical radical added arch-wasm WebAssembly architecture area-Build-mono labels Mar 25, 2022
@dotnet-issue-labeler dotnet-issue-labeler bot added the untriaged New issue has not been triaged by the area owner label Mar 25, 2022
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 25, 2022

Tagging subscribers to 'arch-wasm': @lewing
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Context: #67017 (comment)

#67017 adds new jobs to AOT some library tests, that need lot of memory, on the build machine instead of helix.

cc @vargaz @lewing

Author: radical
Assignees: -
Labels:

arch-wasm, area-Build-mono
Milestone: -

@lewing lewing added area-Build-mono and removed area-Build-mono untriaged New issue has not been triaged by the area owner labels Mar 25, 2022
@marek-safar marek-safar added this to the Future milestone Jul 20, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
arch-wasm WebAssembly architecture area-Build-mono
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Future
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@radical @lewing @marek-safar