Skip to content

Conversation

@zorkian
Copy link
Member

@zorkian zorkian commented Nov 12, 2022

CODE TOUR: This query was meant to use jitemid (judging from the commit message from 12 years ago which says jitemid), but looks like a typo. Fix it. This should address situations where entries with the same timestamp get ordered weirdly, leading to some odd behaviors on page boundaries. Fixes #2883.

This query was meant to use jitemid (judging from the commit message
from 12 years ago), but looks like a typo. Fix it.
@zorkian
Copy link
Member Author

zorkian commented Nov 19, 2022

On further thinking, I think this is wrong, please don't merge. I want to write some test for this behavior.

@rahaeli
Copy link
Contributor

rahaeli commented Nov 20, 2022

We made a change to the page boundaries logic in open beta that wound up producing really weird and irregular results with some entries getting eaten entirely, so we backed it out again, which I mention only in case it was relevant because my memory coughed up the overview but not the exact details of the change

@zorkian zorkian closed this Oct 21, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

paging through entries filtered by tag losing some entries and repeating others

3 participants