You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A "warnings" member MUST encapsulate the warnings that will be returned to the client.
In some rare cases when warnings happens to be a member is the response schema, this may break the client because of the ambiguity.
Suggestion: If the member name is allowed to be flexible with warnings as the default, this problem can be overcome. Further we can add an additional optional token in the Content-Warning header to identify the name of the member which holds the embedded warnings.
Section 5 of the draft mandates the following:
In some rare cases when warnings happens to be a member is the response schema, this may break the client because of the ambiguity.
Suggestion: If the member name is allowed to be flexible with warnings as the default, this problem can be overcome. Further we can add an additional optional token in the Content-Warning header to identify the name of the member which holds the embedded warnings.
For ex.
Content-Warning: "embedded-warning"; 1590190500; "_warnings"
For the cases where the warning is embedded into a response xml this could be an xpath.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: