update material map script for acts v35.2 #826
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…instead of json. Also added plots for geometry visualizaion
…ny materials outside of the tracking volume, e.g. in the barrel (BIC, solenoid) and backward region to reduce the processing size.
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
ShujieL
added
topic: tracking
and removed
topic: infrastructure
veprbl
reviewed
Feb 7, 2025
Co-authored-by: Dmitry Kalinkin <dmitry.kalinkin@gmail.com>
…on of DETECTOR_CONFIG in the comment
wdconinc
approved these changes
Feb 7, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Briefly, what does this PR introduce?
Update the material map script to acts 35.2 to allow saving map in cbor format. Tested with jug_xl nightly, 02042025
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Please check if this PR fulfills the following:
Does this PR introduce breaking changes? What changes might users need to make to their code?
N/A
Does this PR change default behavior?
N/A