diff --git a/rfcs/text/0015_ols_phase_1.md b/rfcs/text/0015_ols_phase_1.md
index d04d1747d2cf0..bcc576bba1847 100644
--- a/rfcs/text/0015_ols_phase_1.md
+++ b/rfcs/text/0015_ols_phase_1.md
@@ -204,6 +204,19 @@ We are sending a more complex query to Elasticsearch for any find request which
 Since we are only requesting saved objects that the user is authorized to see, there is no additional overhead for Kibana once Elasticsearch has returned the results of the query.
 
 
+## 3.3 Behavior with various plugin configurations
+Kibana can run with and without security enabled. When security is disabled,
+`private` saved objects will be accessible to all users.
+
+| **Plugin Configuration** | Security | Security & Spaces | Spaces |
+| ---- | ------ | ------ | --- |
+|| ✅ Enforced | ✅ Enforced | 🚫 Not enforced: objects will be accessible to all
+
+### Alternative
+If this behavior is not desired, we can prevent `private` saved objects from being accessed whenever security is disabled.
+
+See [unresolved question 3](#83-behavior-when-security-is-disabled)
+
 # 4. Drawbacks
 
 As outlined above, this approach introduces additional overhead to many of the saved object APIs. We minimize this by denoting which saved object types require this additional authorization.
@@ -238,6 +251,9 @@ In addition to the object owner, we also need to allow administrators to manage
 
 We have historically used the `Saved Objects Management` feature for these administrative tasks. This feature grants access to all saved objects, even if you're not authorized to access the "owning" application. Do we consider this privilege sufficient to see and potentially manipulate private saved objects?
 
+## 8.3 Behavior when security is disabled
+When security is disabled, should `private` saved objects still be accessible via the Saved Objects Client?
+