-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 72
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(ses): completePrototypes on Hermes #2563
Conversation
490dbed
to
ba9f9fd
Compare
draft pending testing changes from endo sync in VM and React Native |
we considered implementing endo/packages/ses/src/intrinsics.js Lines 103 to 110 in a13a879
instead in // packages/ses/src/tame-function-tostring.js
// ...
if (
!/^[A-Z]/.test(func.name) &&
func.prototype !== undefined
) {
func.prototype = undefined;
}
// ... but at this point it's too late, so went with the current approach |
https://github.com/endojs/endo/actions/runs/11366289654/job/31616329403?pr=2563 Run npx playwright install --with-deps
npx playwright install --with-deps
shell: /usr/bin/bash -e {0}
Installing dependencies...
Switching to root user to install dependencies...
Hit:1 http://azure.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble InRelease
Get:[2](https://github.com/endojs/endo/actions/runs/11366289654/job/31616329403?pr=2563#step:9:2) http://azure.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble-updates InRelease [126 kB]
Get:[3](https://github.com/endojs/endo/actions/runs/11366289654/job/31616329403?pr=2563#step:9:3) http://azure.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble-backports InRelease [126 kB]
Get:[4](https://github.com/endojs/endo/actions/runs/11366289654/job/31616329403?pr=2563#step:9:5) http://azure.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble-security InRelease [126 kB]
Hit:[5](https://github.com/endojs/endo/actions/runs/11366289654/job/31616329403?pr=2563#step:9:6) https://packages.microsoft.com/repos/azure-cli noble InRelease
Get:[6](https://github.com/endojs/endo/actions/runs/11366289654/job/31616329403?pr=2563#step:9:7) https://packages.microsoft.com/ubuntu/24.04/prod noble InRelease [3600 B]
Get:7 http://azure.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble-updates/main amd64 Packages [59[7](https://github.com/endojs/endo/actions/runs/11366289654/job/31616329403?pr=2563#step:9:8) kB]
Get:8 http://azure.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble-updates/main Translation-en [146 kB]
Get:9 http://azure.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble-updates/main amd64 c-n-f Metadata [10.3 kB]
Get:10 http://azure.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble-updates/universe amd64 Packages [706 kB]
Get:11 http://azure.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble-updates/universe Translation-en [209 kB]
Get:12 http://azure.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble-updates/universe amd64 c-n-f Metadata [19.[8](https://github.com/endojs/endo/actions/runs/11366289654/job/31616329403?pr=2563#step:9:9) kB]
Get:13 http://azure.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble-updates/restricted amd64 Packages [388 kB]
Get:14 http://azure.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble-updates/restricted Translation-en [74.8 kB]
Get:15 http://azure.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble-updates/multiverse amd64 Packages [14.8 kB]
Get:16 http://azure.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble-updates/multiverse Translation-en [3820 B]
Get:17 http://azure.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble-updates/multiverse amd64 c-n-f Metadata [552 B]
Get:18 http://azure.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble-backports/universe amd64 Packages [10.6 kB]
Get:1[9](https://github.com/endojs/endo/actions/runs/11366289654/job/31616329403?pr=2563#step:9:10) http://azure.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble-backports/universe Translation-en [10.8 kB]
Get:20 http://azure.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble-backports/universe amd64 c-n-f Metadata [1[10](https://github.com/endojs/endo/actions/runs/11366289654/job/31616329403?pr=2563#step:9:11)4 B]
Get:21 http://azure.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble-security/main amd64 Packages [410 kB]
Get:22 http://azure.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble-security/main Translation-en [90.4 kB]
Get:23 http://azure.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble-security/main amd64 c-n-f Metadata [5788 B]
Get:24 http://azure.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble-security/universe amd64 Packages [553 kB]
Get:25 http://azure.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble-security/universe Translation-en [147 kB]
Get:26 http://azure.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble-security/universe amd64 c-n-f Metadata [13.5 kB]
Get:27 https://packages.microsoft.com/ubuntu/24.04/prod noble/main armhf Packages [5057 B]
Get:28 https://packages.microsoft.com/ubuntu/24.04/prod noble/main amd64 Packages [12.2 kB]
Get:29 https://packages.microsoft.com/ubuntu/24.04/prod noble/main arm64 Packages [8451 B]
Fetched 3820 kB in 1s (7439 kB/s)
Reading package lists...
Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
Reading state information...
Package libicu70 is not available, but is referred to by another package.
This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
is only available from another source
Package libasound2 is a virtual package provided by:
liboss4-salsa-asound2 4.2-build2020-1ubuntu3
libasound2t64 1.2.[11](https://github.com/endojs/endo/actions/runs/11366289654/job/31616329403?pr=2563#step:9:12)-1build2 (= 1.2.11-1build2)
E: Package 'libasound2' has no installation candidate
E: Package 'libicu70' has no installation candidate
E: Unable to locate package libffi7
E: Unable to locate package libx264-163
Failed to install browsers
Error: Installation process exited with code: 100
Error: Process completed with exit code 1. flakey CI, re-run edit: fail persisting after re-run and happening elsewhere #2583 (comment)
|
a13a879
to
2b0b560
Compare
Another thought: concise functions in Hermes may incorrectly have a $ eshost -se '[()=>{}, (()=>{}).bind()].map(fn => Object.hasOwnProperty.call(fn, "prototype"))'
#### engine262, GraalJS, JavaScriptCore, Moddable XS, QuickJS, SpiderMonkey, V8
false,false
#### Hermes
true,false So any receiver-insensitive function that needs be presented as non-newable (which I think describes all functions that we want to appear native) can be wrapped with |
@leotm I believe this is because GitHub runner images switched from This should fix it: |
good point ^ same with normal functions # Hermes release version: 0.12.0, HBC bytecode version: 89
>> [function(){}, (function(){}).bind()].map(fn => Object.hasOwnProperty.call(fn, "prototype"))
[ true, false, [length]: 2 ] so binding the intrinsic works too after restoring the permits |
packages/ses/src/intrinsics.js
Outdated
if (!namePrototype) { | ||
const permitPrototype = permit.prototype; | ||
|
||
// Bypass Hermes bug, fixed in: https://github.com/facebook/hermes/commit/00f18c89c720e1c34592bb85a1a8d311e6e99599 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please explain the Hermes bug you're bypassing below, in addition to the commit link.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
TODO: add explanation pending investigation how lockdown
/ harden
/ %InitialGetStackString%
are defined in SES
- if (object literal) concise method, commit link is correct
- likely
harden
- likely
%InitialGetStackString%
- likely
- if concise (arrow) function, facebook/hermes@c42491d
- likely
lockdown
- likely
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
just clarifying the above (how these three are defined in SES)
- lockdown: arrow fn
- harden: arrow fn
- getStackString: (object literal) concise (shorthand) method
endo/packages/ses/src/lockdown-shim.js
Lines 15 to 18 in 4ca4028
globalThis.lockdown = options => { | |
const hardenIntrinsics = repairIntrinsics(options); | |
globalThis.harden = hardenIntrinsics(); | |
}; |
endo/packages/ses/src/lockdown.js
Line 408 in 4ca4028
const hardenIntrinsics = () => { |
endo/packages/ses/src/error/tame-error-constructor.js
Lines 21 to 23 in 4ca4028
// Use concise methods to obtain named functions without constructors. | |
const tamedMethods = { | |
getStackString(error) { |
so added commit earlier updating documentation in permits.js and intrinsics.js 575cd60
packages/ses/src/permits.js
Outdated
@@ -281,6 +282,7 @@ export const AsyncFunctionInstance = { | |||
|
|||
// Aliases | |||
const fn = FunctionInstance; | |||
const hermesFn = { ...FunctionInstance, prototype: 'undefined' }; // Bypass Hermes bug, fixed in: https://github.com/facebook/hermes/commit/00f18c89c720e1c34592bb85a1a8d311e6e99599 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Likewise. Is there an issue for this Hermes bug?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
for concise (arrow) functions
- no issue was raised
- facebook/hermes@c42491d fixed in Hermes v0.13.0
but yes for (object literal) concise (shorthand) methods
- Short-hand methods don't have prototype / construct facebook/hermes#1371
- facebook/hermes@00f18c8 fixed in Static Hermes (unreleased)
lockdown: hermesFn, | ||
harden: { ...hermesFn, isFake: 'boolean' }, | ||
|
||
'%InitialGetStackString%': fn, | ||
'%InitialGetStackString%': hermesFn, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why exactly these three?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it's these three intrinsics ^ that throw at
endo/packages/ses/src/intrinsics.js
Lines 101 to 104 in 7a991aa
const namePrototype = permit.prototype; | |
if (!namePrototype) { | |
throw TypeError(`${name}.prototype property not whitelisted`); | |
} |
when calling lockdown()
on Hermes VM (surfaced in React Native)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
on Hermes v0.12.0 it's all three ^
on v0.13.0 for RN0.75.x only harden and %InitialGetStackString%
otherwise on Static Hermes (unreleased) none of these are an issue
which atm can only be tested by building and running either sh_stable or static_h
after #2334 lands, adding v0.13.0 to CI is up next (it's not on npm, so will need to wget the .tar.gz)
followed by Static Hermes after (no distro yet so in CI will need to build and run from scratch)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm confused. Why doesn't #1221 make this a non-issue, setting the .prototype
to undefined
itself?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
side note: looks like all of the hermes releases have been published to GitHub now?! (but still not npmjs, if planned)
but it remains there's no need for SES to support these older versions
since metamask-mobile is now on React Native 0.72.15
whereas Hermes v0.11.0 for RN0.68.x has been unsupported for years
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But AFAICT
lockdown
is defined as an arrow function. So why is it more problematic than a zillion other arrow functions? Or, perhaps, is it the only intrinsic defined by us as an arrow function?
this part's been puzzling me too...
why is completing the lockdown
prototype a problem on Hermes v0.12.0 (and older)...
but not on Hermes v0.13.0+ 🤔
(and the a zillion other arrow functions)
If all this is true, then it makes sense to permit
prototype: undefined
on these three. So I'll approve on that basis. But before merging, please let us know if this is indeed all true.
sure ^ i'll keep digging to find the answer to these last couple questions (and #1221)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm confused. Why doesn't #1221 make this a non-issue, setting the
.prototype
toundefined
itself?
Is it because the test in intrinsics.js is inconsistently stricter than the #1221 test in permit-intrinsics.js and runs first?
exactly the current order and strictness on master
is
- intrinsics.js > completePrototypes
isObject(intrinsic)
objectHasOwnProperty(intrinsic, 'prototype')
typeof permit === 'object'
!permit.prototype
throw TypeError(`${name}.prototype property not whitelisted`);
- permit-intrinsics.js > whitelistIntrinsics
prop in obj
typeof obj === 'function' && prop === 'prototype'
obj.prototype = undefined
(not reached)- fix: tolerate empty func.prototype #1221
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Separately, it looks like a bug that
the test in intrinsics.js is inconsistently stricter than the #1221 test in permit-intrinsics.js and runs first
Could you file an issue on that and assign it to me? Thanks.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So why is it more problematic than a zillion other arrow functions?
for example checking: permits.js > Appendix B > Annex B
endo/packages/ses/src/permits.js
Lines 1613 to 1650 in 4ca4028
// Appendix B | |
// Annex B: Additional Properties of the Global Object | |
escape: fn, | |
unescape: fn, | |
// Proposed | |
'%UniqueCompartment%': { | |
'[[Proto]]': '%FunctionPrototype%', | |
prototype: '%CompartmentPrototype%', | |
toString: fn, | |
}, | |
'%InertCompartment%': { | |
'[[Proto]]': '%FunctionPrototype%', | |
prototype: '%CompartmentPrototype%', | |
toString: fn, | |
}, | |
'%CompartmentPrototype%': { | |
constructor: '%InertCompartment%', | |
evaluate: fn, | |
globalThis: getter, | |
name: getter, | |
import: asyncFn, | |
load: asyncFn, | |
importNow: fn, | |
module: fn, | |
'@@toStringTag': 'string', | |
}, | |
lockdown: fn, | |
harden: { ...fn, isFake: 'boolean' }, | |
'%InitialGetStackString%': fn, | |
}; |
these aren't problematic on Hermes
since they're not proposed by SES
so already implemented correctly in Hermes natively:
function escape() { [native code] }
function unescape() { [native code] }
however our three functions proposed by SES are problematic
since we are adding them to Hermes as buggy arrow functions and concise methods:
function (a0) { [bytecode] } // lockdown
function harden(a0) { [bytecode] } // harden
function getStackString(a0) { [bytecode] } // intrinsic: %InitialGetStackString%
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM module suggestions, especially #2563 (comment)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm too unfamiliar with this to feel comfortable approving it. But here I am anyway!
@leotm Are we testing against Hermes in CI somewhere? Can you point me to it?
packages/ses/src/permits.js
Outdated
@@ -270,6 +270,7 @@ export const FunctionInstance = { | |||
// Do not specify "prototype" here, since only Function instances that can | |||
// be used as a constructor have a prototype property. For constructors, | |||
// since prototype properties are instance-specific, we define it there. | |||
// The exception to this is Hermes, fixed since in Static Hermes. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't know what "Static Hermes" is. add reference to comment?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
added here 1d4bd35
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@leotm Are we testing against Hermes in CI somewhere? Can you point me to it?
both proposed 2 changes (permits.js, intrinsics.js) can be verified working against Hermes CI in
https://github.com/endojs/endo/tree/ses-hermes-whitelistIntrinsics-repro
running yarn build:hermes && yarn test:hermes
where completePrototypes is now fixed on Hermes
otherwise final changes to #2334 nearly ready for official Hermes CI feedback
575cd60
to
048efd3
Compare
all questions answered and addressed ^ in comments and commits |
Closes: #2598 Refs: #2563 #2334 #1221 ## Description #1221 was supposed to make ses tolerate undeletable `func.prototype` properties that should be absent, so long as they could be set to `undefined` instead, making them harmless. This tolerance came with a warning to flag the remaining non-conformance. However #2598 explains why #1221 sometimes fails to do this. #1221 did come with a test, but it fell into the case where #1221 works, which is a non-toplevel function. #2563 (and #2334 ?) fell into the trap explained by #2598 and untested by #1221, which is an undeletable `func.prototype` on a top-level instrinsic. As a result, #2563 currently contains a workaround for #2598 which this PR would make unnecessary. This PR fixes the problem by factoring out the `func.prototype`-tolerant property deletion into a separate `cauterizeProperty` function which it calls from both places. This PR also adds the test that was missing from #1221 , having first checked that the test detects #2598 when run without the rest of this PR. If this PR gets merged before #2563, then #2563's workaround for #2598 can first be removed before it is merged. - [ ] TODO should pass a genuine reporter in to all calls to `cauterizeProperty`. @kriskowal , please advise how intrinsics.js should arrange to do so. ### Security Considerations Allowing a `func.prototype` property that really shouldn't be there seems safe, so long as it is safely set to `undefined` first, which this PR does, and then checks that it has done so. ### Scaling Considerations none ### Documentation Considerations generally, this would be one less thing to worry about, and thus one less thing that needs to be documented for most users. ### Testing Considerations Adds the test that was missing from #1221 that let #2598 go unnoticed until #2563 ### Compatibility Considerations Should be none. ### Upgrade Considerations Should be none.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wouldn't really understand this stuff without a considerable walkthrough. Sorry I am useless!
if ( | ||
typeof intrinsic === 'function' && | ||
intrinsic.prototype !== undefined && | ||
permitPrototype === 'undefined' // permits.js |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it's literally the string undefined
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes. When a permit is a string which is a typeof
name, it means "this field must be a value whose typeof
is that string. The only value v
for which typeof v === 'undefined'
is undefined
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But, IIUC, given #2624 , none of this may still be necessary, which is why I ask.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Or the possibility of just forcing these functions to have no prototype
property even in Hermes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
after testing #2624 with can confirm #2624 fixes completePrototypes on Hermes - i.e. this PR simplifies to no longer necessary - thank you! results Removing lockdown.prototype
Tolerating undeletable lockdown.prototype === undefined
Removing harden.prototype
Tolerating undeletable harden.prototype === undefined
Removing %InitialGetStackString%.prototype
Tolerating undeletable %InitialGetStackString%.prototype === undefined |
Description
Calling lockdown on Hermes, in the VM or React Native runtime, we reach
endo/packages/ses/src/intrinsics.js
Lines 101 to 104 in 7b8c677
checking the
lockdown
intrinsic descriptorwe see it's because the
prototype
is non-standardendo/packages/ses/src/permits.js
Line 1644 in 7b8c677
endo/packages/ses/src/permits.js
Lines 282 to 283 in 7b8c677
endo/packages/ses/src/permits.js
Lines 265 to 273 in 7b8c677
so we should be terminating the current loop iteration instead of throwing the error, ideally at
endo/packages/ses/src/intrinsics.js
Lines 93 to 96 in 7b8c677
the initial approach fixed our 3 problematic intrinsics on Hermes
by terminating the current loop iteration earlier
before throwing the error as intended
i.e. skip completing prototypes that shouldn't be there
Repro branch including proposed fix and detailed Hermes VM print output (no Babel)
yarn clean && yarn build:hermes && test:hermes
TODO: check v0.13.0 for RN0.75.x ✅ partially fixed:
lockdown
intrinsic onlywe can easily test this in #2334 by downloading the .tar.gz locally then updating both binary paths
nb:
endo/packages/ses/src/permits.js
Lines 1644 to 1647 in 7b8c677
TODO: build Static Hermes with cmake and ninja then test (i.e. is it fully fixed upstream?)
yes ✅ object literals short hand method
the current proposed change accounts for Hermes' non-standard fn instance prototype (fixed in Static Hermes), by setting it to
undefined
when completing the prototypesanother approach: #2563 (comment)
Security Considerations
Scaling Considerations
Documentation Considerations
lockdown
is fixed on v0.13.0 for RN0.75.x, so this part of the condition can be sunset when we want to drop support for v0.12.0Testing Considerations
Compatibility Considerations
Considered alternative solution
which accounts for
{ ... "prototype":{"value":{},"writable":true,"enumerable":false,"configurable":false} }
but this breaks building the ses bundle when calling
whitelistIntrinsics
aftercompletePrototypes
which appears to be a regression, so no bueno
(See also Documentation Considerations RE backward compatibility)
Upgrade Considerations
(See also Documentation Considerations RE backward compatibility)