Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use the latest EDM version (3.0.1) #410

Closed
rahulporuri opened this issue Jul 18, 2020 · 2 comments · Fixed by #424
Closed

Use the latest EDM version (3.0.1) #410

rahulporuri opened this issue Jul 18, 2020 · 2 comments · Fixed by #424

Comments

@rahulporuri
Copy link
Contributor

rahulporuri commented Jul 18, 2020

A new major version of EDM is available and it would be good to update to the latest version - https://assets.enthought.com/downloads/edm/. This should be as simple as updating the environment variables in travis and appveyor config files.

- INSTALL_EDM_VERSION=2.0.0

INSTALL_EDM_VERSION: "2.0.0"

@rahulporuri
Copy link
Contributor Author

Note that there is a major behavioral change with version 3.0.1 of EDM - the default platform tag used on unix is rh7, not rh6. Previously, users needed to explicitly pass the rh7 platform cmdline flag if they wanted to created an rh7 environment and rh6 was the default if no flag was set.

We weren't setting this flag earlier -

"edm environments create {environment} --force --version={runtime}",

When we update edm to version 3.0.1, we will automatically switch to using the rh7 environments + rh7 packages in the environments instead of rh6. This should not break anything but we need to be aware of this change.

@itziakos
Copy link
Member

itziakos commented Oct 26, 2020

Note that there is a major behavioral change with version 3.0.1 of EDM - the default platform tag used on unix is rh7, not rh6.

FYI, this is not exactly true. EDM 3.x will use as default platform rh6 or rh7 based on the libc version of the system. On old systems rh6 will be the default while on more recent systems it will be rh7.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants