Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

IDT mixed base declaration does't work proprtly if used with sugar modifier (r) #2388

Open
AlexeyGirin opened this issue Sep 16, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

IDT mixed base declaration does't work proprtly if used with sugar modifier (r) #2388

AlexeyGirin opened this issue Sep 16, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
Bug IDT Priority: High
Milestone
Indigo-1.28.0-rc....

Comments

@AlexeyGirin
Copy link
Collaborator

AlexeyGirin commented Sep 16, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Toggle to Macro - Flex mode
  2. Load IDT from paste from clipboard way: r(B1:00503020)(B1)
    image

Actual behavior
System throws an error: Convert error! Given string could not be loaded as (query or plain) molecule or reaction, see the error messages: 'SEQUENCE loader: Unknown mixed base 'B1''
image

Expected behavior
System loads IDT sequence correct
image

As per @ljubica-milovic finding:
image

Versions

  • Ketcher Version 2.25.0-rc.2 Build at 2024-09-14; 10:47:47
  • Indigo Toolkit Version 1.24.0-rc.2.0-g5f2751d70-wasm32-wasm-clang-19.0.0
  • Chrome Version 128.0.6613.138 (Official Build) (64-bit)
  • Win10

Reference issues: #1619
@AlexeyGirin AlexeyGirin added this to the Indigo-1.25.0-rc.1 milestone Sep 16, 2024
@AlexeyGirin AlexeyGirin changed the title [NEED TO ME CONFIRMED BEFORE FIX] IDT mixed base declaration does't work proprtly if used with sugar modifier (r) IDT mixed base declaration does't work proprtly if used with sugar modifier (r) Sep 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Bug IDT Priority: High
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Indigo-1.28.0-rc.1 (Stabilization)
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@AlexanderSavelyev @AlexeyGirin