-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Vignette on parameter uncertainty #131
Conversation
Hi @adamkucharski - I've drafted this PR from your branch on |
Thanks. One thing that would be useful to add is a plot of outcomes in the final section of the vignette, e.g. showing the trajectories of cases from the |
Thanks, can definitely do! Will tag you again once it's complete. |
b9100d9
to
82be92a
Compare
This pull request:
(cc @Bisaloo for workflow monitoring) |
This pull request:
(cc @Bisaloo for workflow monitoring) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is looking very nice – good starting example that should open doors for a lot of useful scenario analysis work. Only a couple of minor comments.
This pull request:
(cc @Bisaloo for workflow monitoring) |
Great, thanks for the feedback, merging this now. |
This PR is related to #20 and adds a vignette initially authored by @adamkucharski showing how to use {EpiEstim} to generate an$R$ estimate, and how to run multiple iterations of $R$ values.
epidemic_default_*()
for differentThis PR is scheduled be merged after #128.