Fixing coverage workflow

[gomezzz]

Description

Fixing the coverage comment failing on current CI

(following advice from MishaKav/pytest-coverage-comment#68 )

Resolved Issues

N/A

How Has This Been Tested?

In this PR

Related Pull Requests

• Gaussian quadrature #141

[github-actions]

Coverage Report

File	Stmts	Miss	Cover	Missing
boole_test.py	52	4	92%	128–131
gradient_test.py	96	4	96%	108, 270–272
helper_functions.py	44	1	98%	314
integration_grid_test.py	37	4	89%	83–86
integration_test_functions.py	91	2	98%	50, 137
integrator_types_test.py	57	7	88%	114–120
monte_carlo_test.py	66	4	94%	162–165
rng_test.py	38	8	79%	64–71
simpson_test.py	65	4	94%	159–162
trapezoid_test.py	66	4	94%	156–159
utils_integration_test.py	107	8	93%	38–39, 200–206
vegas_map_test.py	73	5	93%	18, 155–158
vegas_stratification_test.py	50	4	92%	93–96
vegas_test.py	102	13	87%	227–241
torchquad
__init__.py	19	19	0%	1–42
torchquad/integration
base_integrator.py	42	7	83%	28, 57–60, 64, 87, 91, 96
boole.py	30	3	90%	54, 75–79
integration_grid.py	38	3	92%	32, 91, 94
monte_carlo.py	97	4	96%	100, 221–222, 244
newton_cotes.py	96	7	93%	25, 123, 202–203, 205–206, 229
rng.py	62	24	61%	72–75, 92–120, 140
simpson.py	29	3	90%	52, 71–75
utils.py	100	9	91%	100, 139, 170, 174, 181, 190, 193, 195, 210
vegas.py	161	4	98%	95, 99–100, 188
vegas_map.py	98	6	94%	263–273
torchquad/utils
enable_cuda.py	12	6	50%	16–21
set_precision.py	24	3	88%	35–38, 68
set_up_backend.py	19	1	95%	12
TOTAL	1853	171	91%

Tests	Skipped	Failures	Errors	Time
48	0 💤	0 ❌	0 🔥	1m 55s ⏱️

[gomezzz]

@ilan-gold this should fix the failing comment thing, maybe we merge this first and then into #141 ? :)

[ilan-gold]

Sounds good @gomezzz