From 0ec6181771607c0f2b0eec95701af84442ec9b6c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alex Beregszaszi Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 03:16:37 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Automatically merged updates to draft EIP(s) 663 (#2038) Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because: - It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s) - The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP - The build is passing --- EIPS/eip-663.md | 19 ++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/EIPS/eip-663.md b/EIPS/eip-663.md index 47786a1d24a3a..fe42c2b768ffa 100644 --- a/EIPS/eip-663.md +++ b/EIPS/eip-663.md @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ created: 2017-07-03 ## Abstract -`SWAP` and `DUP` instructions are limited to a stack depth of 16. Introduce two new instructions, `SWAPn` and `DUPn`, which lift this limitation and allow accessing the stack up to its full depth of 1024 items. +Currently, `SWAP` and `DUP` instructions are limited to a stack depth of 16. Introduce two new instructions, `SWAPn` and `DUPn`, which lift this limitation and allow accessing the stack up to its full depth of 1024 items. ## Motivation @@ -22,9 +22,12 @@ Introducing `SWAPn` and `DUPn` will provide an option to compilers to simplify a ## Specification +### Option A + Instructions `DUPn` (`0xb0`) and `SWAPn` (`0xb1`) are introduced, which take the top item from stack (referred to as `n`). If `n` exceeds 1024 or the current stack depth is less than `n`, then a stack underflow exception is issued. If the current stack depth is at the limit, a stack overflow exception is issued. +In both of these cases the EVM stops and all gas is consumed. Otherwise - for `DUPn` the stack item at depth `n` is duplicated at the top of the stack @@ -34,6 +37,20 @@ The gas cost for both instructions is set at 3. In reality the cost for such an Since both of these instructions require the top stack item to contain the position, it is still only possible to reach more than 16 stack items if there is at least one free stack slot. +This option has no effect no static analyzers, given no immediate value is introduced. + +### Option B + +The difference to Option A is that `DUPn` and `SWAPn` do not take the value of `n` from the top stack item, but instead encode it as a 16-bit big endian immediate value following the opcode. + +This results in wasting a byte in the cases of only referring to the top 255 stack items. + +### Option C + +This option extends Option A with two new instructions, `DUPSn` and `SWAPSn`, where the value of `n` is encoded as an 8-bit immediate value following the opcode. + +The value `n` has a range of 0 to 255, but otherwise the same rules apply as in Option A. + ## Rationale TBA