Update EIP-7623: Move to Withdrawn

[wjmelements]

Changes

• Describe Gas Sheltering in Security Considerations section
• Move status to Withdrawn

[eth-bot]

File EIPS/eip-7623.md

Requires 1 more reviewers from @nerolation, @vbuterin

[nerolation]

I disagree.
You say in the security section that one needs to consider the worst case blocks after users start playing the games you describe:

Have you ever checked what the worst case block size would then be?
If there's a user that needs EVM computation worth 20m gas and another who wants to add 10m gas worth of data to the chain, then, depite being irrelevant if it's one or two users, the max possible blocksize is still significantly reduced.

[wjmelements]

I never said it wouldn’t reduce the block size. But on that topic, the same reduction can also be achieved more securely and thoroughly by removing the maximum-gas mechanism.

…

On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 12:32 AM Toni Wahrstätter ***@***.***> wrote: I disagree. You say in the security section that one needs to consider the worst case blocks after users start playing the games you describe: Have you ever checked what the worst case block size would then be? If there's a user that needs EVM computation worth 20m gas and another who wants to add 10m gas worth of data to the chain, then, depite being irrelevant if it's one or two users, the max possible blocksize is still significantly reduced. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#8530 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAGDGVMWYCZQFPLUUJYWJ6DZBG2H3AVCNFSM6AAAAABHMCGDAGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDAOJZG43TIMBRHE> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>