-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 326
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Proposal to include EIP-1153 in Shanghai #438
Comments
Arbitrum says they'd also benefit from this: https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/eip-1153-transient-storage-opcodes/553/47?u=fredlacs |
We're very interested at Sealance in this, and I'm happy to help out with implementing, spec review, or whatever else needs to doing to make this a reality. |
Lots of discussion about 1153 in #500 |
Project board tracking implementation progress: |
Closing this issue given 1153 was moved to CFI in #652 |
https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1153
For this particular use case, it would be great to have it in the next hard fork.
EIP-3529 included in London is a regression for transient storage in that it greatly increased its practical gas cost. To prevent future hard forks from making transient storage significantly more expensive or breaking the use case, it's important to create these new opcodes for the specific use case of transient storage.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: