This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 2, 2021. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
swarm, swap: add addresses to logs #1806
swarm, swap: add addresses to logs #1806
Changes from 16 commits
ed9f561
7295408
f91233a
02ef574
c10beae
86bb6e7
1632fdb
9d6eb39
f1c3fc4
b6086a1
c151daa
ecfec4c
518ccf1
083cb4e
0746650
0399110
6a6c293
e35dc65
1100486
7be01a1
272db7f
f771aa2
e424853
0d892a3
a0238b7
423ff3d
f4e5156
8c42e64
7989efc
346edeb
2d25f1f
1f58276
edc9db0
481f5e0
d91d4a6
43d8d45
32af153
48dc81b
c49d7cb
6ebda39
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
wouldn't it be good to log which cheque was processed and verified? without any identifying details this logline doesn't say much
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we could add
honey
as in line307
, but other than that, i'm not sure which field could identify a cheque in a way that is useful for logs.i am certain that knowing a cheque has arrived/been sent is useful already.
tagging @ralph-pichler and @Eknir for insight
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The
CumulativePayout
andContract
fields should be enough to uniquely identify which cheque it is. Instead ofContract
p.beneficiary
might also be useful (this would be the signer of the cheque here).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
added
Beneficiary
andCumulativePayout
to thisDebug
log entrythanks guys