From dc7cc8f1a2355e0b49ce88fb04113e32e02d26c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: jddelaune Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2024 22:26:36 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] Fixed broken link in grains performance doc --- exercises/practice/grains/.articles/performance/content.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/exercises/practice/grains/.articles/performance/content.md b/exercises/practice/grains/.articles/performance/content.md index b115001831..7ab12a1478 100644 --- a/exercises/practice/grains/.articles/performance/content.md +++ b/exercises/practice/grains/.articles/performance/content.md @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ pow square 64: 5.738279999932274e-07 Using `if number not in range(1, 65):` was over `125` nanoseconds longer than using `if number < 1 or number > 64:` for all approaches. [approaches]: https://exercism.org/tracks/python/exercises/grains/approaches -[approach-bit-shifting]: https://exercism.org/python/csharp/exercises/grains/approaches/bit-shifting +[approach-bit-shifting]: https://exercism.org/tracks/python/exercises/grains/approaches/bit-shifting [approach-pow]: https://exercism.org/tracks/python/exercises/grains/approaches/pow [approach-exponentiation]: https://exercism.org/tracks/python/exercises/grains/approaches/exponentiation [benchmark-application]: https://github.com/exercism/python/blob/main/exercises/practice/grains/.articles/performance/code/Benchmark.py