From 8007ef6cefb68e24388a48a7385a9368ff2688cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Filip=20Kud=C5=82a?= <11212541+kjugi@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2025 22:32:08 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Update docs/adr/isomorphism-support.md MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Co-authored-by: Ulises Gascón --- docs/adr/isomorphism-support.md | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/adr/isomorphism-support.md b/docs/adr/isomorphism-support.md index 5f7b7b0..5ff45e4 100644 --- a/docs/adr/isomorphism-support.md +++ b/docs/adr/isomorphism-support.md @@ -18,9 +18,9 @@ Proposed The document's objective is to gather all notable comments and thoughts in one place and track potential changes in this topic. We have noticed that it is repeated frequently in many issues from the community and we need to take action. -Based on the comments in the issues we know that some of you might not feel happy about it. We have acknowledged the need and discussion around it touched on multiple scenarios. Including: -- rethinking the process and exposing both paths for all libraries -- expose both paths for selected libraries +We have acknowledged the need and discussion around it touched on multiple scenarios. Including: +- rethinking the process and exposing both options (ESM and CommonJS) for all libraries +- expose both options (ESM and CommonJS) for selected libraries - keeping default settings as the main target is on the server **Why do we need this decision?**