Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

the final, full cross platform support (how could this be done?) (non-web desktop support) #309

Open
softmarshmallow opened this issue Jun 6, 2020 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request pinned

Comments

@softmarshmallow
Copy link

Hey, guys. since mapbox is the coolest map platform on the earth. there could be so much use cases on using mapbox on flutter running on desktop platforms (windows/mac/linux). in my case, i'm trying to use on my company's admin desktop app built on flutter.

yet, flutter team says desktop in only in preview, but it is showing us so much better performance than flutter web, and i haven't faced any critical failures while developing for desktop platform (works like magic!)

bringing back to topic there can be two (or one) ways to make mapbox fully crossplatform.

  1. simply showing mapbox-gl through flutter's webview and interfacing.
  2. using mapbox official support interfacing

viewing the second link, it supports mac and linux officially.
windows needs some look in since it should be done with glfw or qt way. or the first webview way.

let's share thoughts on this!

i beleive mapbox flutter on desktop apps will be a super use case and, just makes sense.

@tobrun
Copy link
Collaborator

tobrun commented Jun 6, 2020

All points listed above are valid, great 🕵️ work. Supporting windows will be a painpoint and I would suggest running first with a flutter webview implementation (gl-js) that we can later port to an actual native solution (mapbox-gl-naitve) for the platforms that support it.

@tobrun tobrun added this to the future milestone Jun 6, 2020
@tobrun tobrun removed this from the future milestone Nov 13, 2021
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jan 14, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Jan 14, 2022
@m0nac0 m0nac0 added enhancement New feature or request and removed stale labels Jan 15, 2022
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Mar 16, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Mar 16, 2022
@stale stale bot removed the stale label Mar 16, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request pinned
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants