You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
byteStringOutput blocks and waits for the entire output in ssCreate.
startProcess calls ssCreate.
So startProcess blocks if I use byteStringOutput. (Well, this is already bad.)
withProcessTerm is broken because it blocks in the startProcess stage. The user-provided action can only run after stdout is closed.
This bug makes this library unsuitable for almost all my use cases :( Since I often need to capture the output while setting some kind of timeout on the subprocess. Sadly I'm not sure how it can be fixed without a major redesign.
(Sorry if this is a duplicate of other open issues. I checked them but I'm not sure.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
byteStringOutput
blocks and waits for the entire output inssCreate
.startProcess
callsssCreate
.startProcess
blocks if I usebyteStringOutput
. (Well, this is already bad.)withProcessTerm
is broken because it blocks in thestartProcess
stage. The user-provided action can only run after stdout is closed.This bug makes this library unsuitable for almost all my use cases :( Since I often need to capture the output while setting some kind of timeout on the subprocess. Sadly I'm not sure how it can be fixed without a major redesign.
(Sorry if this is a duplicate of other open issues. I checked them but I'm not sure.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: