From 8af30132f14737a8d41db48aad9e78df396d8990 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stjepan Glavina <stjepang@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 14:01:01 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Inline functions Ordering::{then, then_with}

@jongiddy noticed bad performance due to the lack of inlining on `then`
and `then_with`. I confirmed that inlining really is the culprit by
creating a custom `then` function and repeating his benchmark on my
machine with and without the `#[inline]` attribute.

The numbers were exactly the same on my machine without the attribute.
With `#[inline]` I got the same performance as I did with manually
inlined implementation.
---
 src/libcore/cmp.rs | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/src/libcore/cmp.rs b/src/libcore/cmp.rs
index cc066099cf8b0..b43fe757d8473 100644
--- a/src/libcore/cmp.rs
+++ b/src/libcore/cmp.rs
@@ -277,6 +277,7 @@ impl Ordering {
     ///
     /// assert_eq!(result, Ordering::Less);
     /// ```
+    #[inline]
     #[unstable(feature = "ordering_chaining", issue = "37053")]
     pub fn then(self, other: Ordering) -> Ordering {
         match self {
@@ -315,6 +316,7 @@ impl Ordering {
     ///
     /// assert_eq!(result, Ordering::Less);
     /// ```
+    #[inline]
     #[unstable(feature = "ordering_chaining", issue = "37053")]
     pub fn then_with<F: FnOnce() -> Ordering>(self, f: F) -> Ordering {
         match self {