diff --git a/.github/workflows/jsweep.lock.yml b/.github/workflows/jsweep.lock.yml
index a6e834141a..87fb345b0f 100644
--- a/.github/workflows/jsweep.lock.yml
+++ b/.github/workflows/jsweep.lock.yml
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
 #   gh aw compile
 # For more information: https://github.com/githubnext/gh-aw/blob/main/.github/aw/github-agentic-workflows.md
 #
-# Daily JavaScript unbloater that cleans one .cjs file per day using modern JavaScript patterns
+# Daily JavaScript unbloater that cleans one .cjs file per day, prioritizing files with @ts-nocheck to enable type checking
 
 name: "jsweep - JavaScript Unbloater"
 "on":
@@ -558,7 +558,8 @@ jobs:
           - Files in `/home/runner/work/gh-aw/gh-aw/actions/setup/js/*.cjs`
           - Exclude test files (`*.test.cjs`)
           - Exclude files you've already cleaned (stored in cache-memory as `cleaned_files` array)
-          - Pick the **one file** with the earliest modification timestamp that hasn't been cleaned
+          - **Priority 1**: Pick files with `@ts-nocheck` or `// @ts-nocheck` comments (these need type checking enabled)
+          - **Priority 2**: If no uncleaned files with `@ts-nocheck` remain, pick the **one file** with the earliest modification timestamp that hasn't been cleaned
           
           If no uncleaned files remain, start over with the oldest cleaned file.
           
@@ -566,6 +567,7 @@ jobs:
           
           Before making changes to the file:
           - Determine the execution context (github-script vs Node.js)
+          - **Check if the file has `@ts-nocheck` comment** - if so, your goal is to remove it and fix type errors
           - Identify code smells: unnecessary try/catch, verbose patterns, missing modern syntax
           - Check if the file has a corresponding test file
           - Read the test file to understand expected behavior
@@ -574,6 +576,44 @@ jobs:
           
           Apply these principles to the file:
           
+          **Remove `@ts-nocheck` and Fix Type Errors (High Priority):**
+          ```javascript
+          // ❌ BEFORE: Type checking disabled
+          // @ts-nocheck - Type checking disabled due to complex type errors requiring refactoring
+          /// <reference types="@actions/github-script" />
+          
+          async function processData(data) {
+            return data.items.map(item => item.value);  // Type errors ignored
+          }
+          
+          // ✅ AFTER: Type checking enabled with proper types
+          // @ts-check
+          /// <reference types="@actions/github-script" />
+          
+          /**
+           * Process data items
+           * @param {{ items: Array<{ value: string }> }} data - Input data
+           * @returns {Array<string>} Processed values
+           */
+          async function processData(data) {
+            return data.items.map(item => item.value);
+          }
+          ```
+          
+          **Steps to remove `@ts-nocheck`:**
+          1. Remove the `@ts-nocheck` comment from the file
+          2. Replace it with `@ts-check` to enable type checking
+          3. Run `npm run typecheck` to see type errors
+          4. Fix type errors by:
+             - Adding JSDoc type annotations for functions and parameters
+             - Adding proper type declarations for variables
+             - Fixing incorrect type usage
+             - Adding proper null checks where needed
+          5. Re-run `npm run typecheck` until all errors are resolved
+          6. The file must pass type checking before creating the PR
+          
+          Apply these principles to the file:
+          
           **Remove Unnecessary Try/Catch:**
           ```javascript
           // ❌ BEFORE: Exception not handled with control flow
@@ -688,14 +728,18 @@ jobs:
           
           ## Important Constraints
           
+          - **PRIORITIZE files with `@ts-nocheck`** - These files need type checking enabled. Remove `@ts-nocheck`, add proper type annotations, and fix all type errors.
           - **DO NOT change logic** - only make the code cleaner and more maintainable
           - **Always add or improve tests** - the file must have comprehensive test coverage with at least 5-10 test cases
           - **Always run tests** after changes to verify they pass: `npm run test:js`
           - **Always run TypeScript typecheck** before creating the PR to ensure type safety: `npm run typecheck`
+            - If the file had `@ts-nocheck`, it MUST pass typecheck after removing it
           - **Always run prettier** to format the code consistently: `npm run format:cjs`
           - **Preserve all functionality** - ensure the file works exactly as before
           - **One file per run** - focus on quality over quantity
-          - **Document your changes** in the PR description, including test improvements
+          - **Document your changes** in the PR description, including:
+            - Whether `@ts-nocheck` was removed and type errors fixed
+            - Test improvements (number of tests added, coverage improvements)
           
           ## Current Repository Context
           
@@ -1242,7 +1286,7 @@ jobs:
         uses: actions/github-script@ed597411d8f924073f98dfc5c65a23a2325f34cd # v8.0.0
         env:
           WORKFLOW_NAME: "jsweep - JavaScript Unbloater"
-          WORKFLOW_DESCRIPTION: "Daily JavaScript unbloater that cleans one .cjs file per day using modern JavaScript patterns"
+          WORKFLOW_DESCRIPTION: "Daily JavaScript unbloater that cleans one .cjs file per day, prioritizing files with @ts-nocheck to enable type checking"
         with:
           script: |
             const fs = require('fs');
diff --git a/.github/workflows/jsweep.md b/.github/workflows/jsweep.md
index f88e0b6ba8..b76644646e 100644
--- a/.github/workflows/jsweep.md
+++ b/.github/workflows/jsweep.md
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 ---
-description: Daily JavaScript unbloater that cleans one .cjs file per day using modern JavaScript patterns
+description: Daily JavaScript unbloater that cleans one .cjs file per day, prioritizing files with @ts-nocheck to enable type checking
 on:
   schedule: daily
   workflow_dispatch:
@@ -57,7 +57,8 @@ Use cache-memory to track which files you've already cleaned. Look for:
 - Files in `/home/runner/work/gh-aw/gh-aw/actions/setup/js/*.cjs`
 - Exclude test files (`*.test.cjs`)
 - Exclude files you've already cleaned (stored in cache-memory as `cleaned_files` array)
-- Pick the **one file** with the earliest modification timestamp that hasn't been cleaned
+- **Priority 1**: Pick files with `@ts-nocheck` or `// @ts-nocheck` comments (these need type checking enabled)
+- **Priority 2**: If no uncleaned files with `@ts-nocheck` remain, pick the **one file** with the earliest modification timestamp that hasn't been cleaned
 
 If no uncleaned files remain, start over with the oldest cleaned file.
 
@@ -65,6 +66,7 @@ If no uncleaned files remain, start over with the oldest cleaned file.
 
 Before making changes to the file:
 - Determine the execution context (github-script vs Node.js)
+- **Check if the file has `@ts-nocheck` comment** - if so, your goal is to remove it and fix type errors
 - Identify code smells: unnecessary try/catch, verbose patterns, missing modern syntax
 - Check if the file has a corresponding test file
 - Read the test file to understand expected behavior
@@ -73,6 +75,44 @@ Before making changes to the file:
 
 Apply these principles to the file:
 
+**Remove `@ts-nocheck` and Fix Type Errors (High Priority):**
+```javascript
+// ❌ BEFORE: Type checking disabled
+// @ts-nocheck - Type checking disabled due to complex type errors requiring refactoring
+/// <reference types="@actions/github-script" />
+
+async function processData(data) {
+  return data.items.map(item => item.value);  // Type errors ignored
+}
+
+// ✅ AFTER: Type checking enabled with proper types
+// @ts-check
+/// <reference types="@actions/github-script" />
+
+/**
+ * Process data items
+ * @param {{ items: Array<{ value: string }> }} data - Input data
+ * @returns {Array<string>} Processed values
+ */
+async function processData(data) {
+  return data.items.map(item => item.value);
+}
+```
+
+**Steps to remove `@ts-nocheck`:**
+1. Remove the `@ts-nocheck` comment from the file
+2. Replace it with `@ts-check` to enable type checking
+3. Run `npm run typecheck` to see type errors
+4. Fix type errors by:
+   - Adding JSDoc type annotations for functions and parameters
+   - Adding proper type declarations for variables
+   - Fixing incorrect type usage
+   - Adding proper null checks where needed
+5. Re-run `npm run typecheck` until all errors are resolved
+6. The file must pass type checking before creating the PR
+
+Apply these principles to the file:
+
 **Remove Unnecessary Try/Catch:**
 ```javascript
 // ❌ BEFORE: Exception not handled with control flow
@@ -187,14 +227,18 @@ After cleaning the file, adding/improving tests, and verifying all tests, TypeSc
 
 ## Important Constraints
 
+- **PRIORITIZE files with `@ts-nocheck`** - These files need type checking enabled. Remove `@ts-nocheck`, add proper type annotations, and fix all type errors.
 - **DO NOT change logic** - only make the code cleaner and more maintainable
 - **Always add or improve tests** - the file must have comprehensive test coverage with at least 5-10 test cases
 - **Always run tests** after changes to verify they pass: `npm run test:js`
 - **Always run TypeScript typecheck** before creating the PR to ensure type safety: `npm run typecheck`
+  - If the file had `@ts-nocheck`, it MUST pass typecheck after removing it
 - **Always run prettier** to format the code consistently: `npm run format:cjs`
 - **Preserve all functionality** - ensure the file works exactly as before
 - **One file per run** - focus on quality over quantity
-- **Document your changes** in the PR description, including test improvements
+- **Document your changes** in the PR description, including:
+  - Whether `@ts-nocheck` was removed and type errors fixed
+  - Test improvements (number of tests added, coverage improvements)
 
 ## Current Repository Context
 
diff --git a/pkg/workflow/jsweep_workflow_test.go b/pkg/workflow/jsweep_workflow_test.go
index 1813dc9955..392fa169cf 100644
--- a/pkg/workflow/jsweep_workflow_test.go
+++ b/pkg/workflow/jsweep_workflow_test.go
@@ -27,7 +27,8 @@ func TestJSweepWorkflowConfiguration(t *testing.T) {
 		if strings.Contains(mdContent, "three .cjs files per day") {
 			t.Error("jsweep workflow should not process three files")
 		}
-		if !strings.Contains(mdContent, "Pick the **one file**") {
+		// Check for "one file" in either Priority 1 or Priority 2
+		if !strings.Contains(mdContent, "one file") {
 			t.Error("jsweep workflow should pick one file")
 		}
 		if strings.Contains(mdContent, "Pick the **three files**") {
@@ -104,7 +105,33 @@ func TestJSweepWorkflowConfiguration(t *testing.T) {
 		}
 	})
 
-	// Test 8: Verify the workflow has a valid lock file
+	// Test 8: Verify the workflow prioritizes files with @ts-nocheck
+	t.Run("PrioritizesTsNocheck", func(t *testing.T) {
+		if !strings.Contains(mdContent, "Priority 1") {
+			t.Error("jsweep workflow should have Priority 1 for file selection")
+		}
+		if !strings.Contains(mdContent, "@ts-nocheck") {
+			t.Error("jsweep workflow should mention @ts-nocheck")
+		}
+		if !strings.Contains(mdContent, "these need type checking enabled") {
+			t.Error("jsweep workflow should explain why @ts-nocheck files are prioritized")
+		}
+	})
+
+	// Test 9: Verify the workflow has instructions to remove @ts-nocheck
+	t.Run("RemovesTsNocheck", func(t *testing.T) {
+		if !strings.Contains(mdContent, "Remove `@ts-nocheck`") {
+			t.Error("jsweep workflow should have instructions to remove @ts-nocheck")
+		}
+		if !strings.Contains(mdContent, "Replace it with `@ts-check`") {
+			t.Error("jsweep workflow should instruct replacing @ts-nocheck with @ts-check")
+		}
+		if !strings.Contains(mdContent, "Fix type errors") {
+			t.Error("jsweep workflow should mention fixing type errors")
+		}
+	})
+
+	// Test 10: Verify the workflow has a valid lock file
 	t.Run("HasValidLockFile", func(t *testing.T) {
 		lockPath := filepath.Join("..", "..", ".github", "workflows", "jsweep.lock.yml")
 		_, err := os.Stat(lockPath)
@@ -149,4 +176,14 @@ func TestJSweepWorkflowLockFile(t *testing.T) {
 			t.Error("Compiled jsweep workflow should include prettier formatting")
 		}
 	})
+
+	// Test 4: Verify @ts-nocheck prioritization is in the compiled workflow
+	t.Run("CompiledTsNocheckPrioritization", func(t *testing.T) {
+		if !strings.Contains(lockContent, "Priority 1") {
+			t.Error("Compiled jsweep workflow should prioritize files with @ts-nocheck")
+		}
+		if !strings.Contains(lockContent, "@ts-nocheck") {
+			t.Error("Compiled jsweep workflow should mention @ts-nocheck")
+		}
+	})
 }