-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[3.x] Bullet: Revert "Fixed gravity scale" #67842
base: 3.x
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
This reverts commit d250ade.
d8db8bb
to
4354db5
Compare
Also fixes #35378 |
See the PR which includes this commit: #13046. It states:
Can you confirm that this does not reintroduce #12770?
Please list it in the OP so that the issue can properly be identified as linked / closed when the PR is merged (this actually doesn't work when merging PRs in non-master branch but it's for the principle/consistency :)). |
Bah, thank you, I was unaware of that one. Looks like this does trigger that regression. Gravity must be affecting the body's velocity for a tick or two before the gravity scale setter is called. I'll do a little more poking. |
Did you have any luck looking into this further? |
Thanks for pinging me on this! I looked at this again today with (very) fresh eyes and I think I understand the problem but I don't have very strong feelings about any potential solutions. The problem with the regression is due to the order of things being initialized, kinda:
One idea I had was to set the RigidBody's gravity after it's added to a space to overwrite the incorrect value. Seems kinda dumb but it seems like that might be the only way to include the body's gravity scale? Any input appreciated :) |
This reverts commit d250ade which appears to have been made in error? (Looks suspicious, commented out line followed by a line which ignores the parameters in favor of a hard-coded zero vector).
Aside from ensuring the gravity vector is normalized (since it gets multiplied by
gravityMagnitude
), I don't see how reverting this would cause any issues.Fixes #32196