fix: handling of superclass generic type parameters #1323
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
product-auto-label
bot
added
size: l
|
@tom-andersen, @milaGGL, can you please take a look at this PR? I'm happy to rebase it onto current main if you are ready for it. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Enhance generic type resolution, so that no actual type arguments are lost.
For backward compatibility, current lenient behavior of generic collection fields is preserved, unless the new
@StrictCollectionTypesannotation is used. A few of the new unit tests verify this lenient behavior. These tests pass with and without this change.Fixes #1313 ☕️