Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Docs: minor improvements to Loki Canary docs #4222

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Aug 31, 2021

Conversation

KMiller-Grafana
Copy link
Contributor

  • reduce size of canary drawing
  • add a description of what Loki Canary does
  • update wording of the configuration options
  • minor grammar improvements throughout the section

Apologies for the extra irrelevant commits on the PR; please ignore; the diff is correct.

  - reduce size of canary drawing
  - add a description of what Loki Canary does
  - update wording of the configuration options
  - minor grammar improvements throughout the section
@KMiller-Grafana KMiller-Grafana requested review from owen-d and a team August 26, 2021 17:01
@owen-d owen-d merged commit 825c497 into grafana:main Aug 31, 2021
@KMiller-Grafana KMiller-Grafana deleted the docs/canary branch August 31, 2021 17:39
@@ -77,15 +83,16 @@ log lines be sure not to set the two out of order time range flags too far in th
The defaults are already enough to test this functionality properly, and setting them
too far in the past can cause issues with the spot check test.

When using `out-of-order-percentage`, you also need to make use of pipeline stages

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

was there supposed to be an extra newline here?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Didn't hurt anything. But probably no, an extra newline was not needed there. We can remove it the next time we touch this section.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants