Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ingester memory improvements by adjusting prealloc #4344

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Nov 19, 2024

Conversation

joe-elliott
Copy link
Member

@joe-elliott joe-elliott commented Nov 19, 2024

What this PR does:

Adjusts the use of prealloc for some nice memory improvements. Two adjustments were made:

  • Remove the use of prealloc for trace ids. We were alloc'ing 500 bytes for every trace id and never recouping them in the sync pool.
  • Change the traces pool to use linear buckets to reduce wasted allocs. In larger clusters millions of these slices are alloc'ed per second. We will have no problem with bucket collisions. Bucket size was tuned using an internal cluster and a metric was added to help diagnose future issues.

Seeing ~30% working set reduction in ingesters.

Checklist

  • Tests updated
  • Documentation added
  • CHANGELOG.md updated - the order of entries should be [CHANGE], [FEATURE], [ENHANCEMENT], [BUGFIX]

Signed-off-by: Joe Elliott <number101010@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joe Elliott <number101010@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joe Elliott <number101010@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joe Elliott <number101010@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joe Elliott <number101010@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joe Elliott <number101010@gmail.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@zalegrala zalegrala left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me. The new metric ought to be interesting.

return p.make(sz)

// Find the right bucket.
bkt := sz / p.bktSize
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I suppose its a trad-off here to alloc or do the math twice.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this doesn't really "alloc" in any way we are concerned about. we're always conscious of allocating memory that escapes to the heap. everything else is cheap. whether this is stored on the stack of just stays in a register it would likely be undetectable from a tempo perf standpoint.


b := p.buckets[bkt].Get()
if b == nil {
sz := (bkt + 1) * p.bktSize
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this alloc, or is the compiler smart enough to see its only used once?

Copy link
Member Author

@joe-elliott joe-elliott Nov 19, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you're really testing my knowledge of compilers :). my guess is this value would never leave a register

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You can do escape analysis in Go with go build -gcflags "-m" <file>. It does not escape :P

@joe-elliott joe-elliott added type/bug Something isn't working backport r175 labels Nov 19, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

This PR must be merged before a backport PR will be created.

1 similar comment
Copy link
Contributor

This PR must be merged before a backport PR will be created.

@joe-elliott joe-elliott merged commit f71c4c6 into grafana:main Nov 19, 2024
20 checks passed
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2024
* remove trace ids

Signed-off-by: Joe Elliott <number101010@gmail.com>

* linear buckets

Signed-off-by: Joe Elliott <number101010@gmail.com>

* changelog

Signed-off-by: Joe Elliott <number101010@gmail.com>

* tuney tune

Signed-off-by: Joe Elliott <number101010@gmail.com>

* metric misses and increase pool size

Signed-off-by: Joe Elliott <number101010@gmail.com>

* lint

Signed-off-by: Joe Elliott <number101010@gmail.com>

---------

Signed-off-by: Joe Elliott <number101010@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit f71c4c6)
joe-elliott added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2024
* remove trace ids

Signed-off-by: Joe Elliott <number101010@gmail.com>

* linear buckets

Signed-off-by: Joe Elliott <number101010@gmail.com>

* changelog

Signed-off-by: Joe Elliott <number101010@gmail.com>

* tuney tune

Signed-off-by: Joe Elliott <number101010@gmail.com>

* metric misses and increase pool size

Signed-off-by: Joe Elliott <number101010@gmail.com>

* lint

Signed-off-by: Joe Elliott <number101010@gmail.com>

---------

Signed-off-by: Joe Elliott <number101010@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit f71c4c6)

Co-authored-by: Joe Elliott <number101010@gmail.com>
Copy link
Contributor

The backport to r174 failed:

The process '/usr/bin/git' failed with exit code 1

To backport manually, run these commands in your terminal:

# Fetch latest updates from GitHub
git fetch
# Create a new branch
git switch --create backport-4344-to-r174 origin/r174
# Cherry-pick the merged commit of this pull request and resolve the conflicts
git cherry-pick -x f71c4c6ccbd81b75826b434d6bf2b82174a757c5

When the conflicts are resolved, stage and commit the changes:

git add . && git cherry-pick --continue

If you have the GitHub CLI installed:

# Push the branch to GitHub:
git push --set-upstream origin backport-4344-to-r174
# Create the PR body template
PR_BODY=$(gh pr view 4344 --json body --template 'Backport f71c4c6ccbd81b75826b434d6bf2b82174a757c5 from #4344{{ "\n\n---\n\n" }}{{ index . "body" }}')
# Create the PR on GitHub
echo "${PR_BODY}" | gh pr create --title '[r174] Ingester memory improvements by adjusting prealloc' --body-file - --label 'type/bug' --label 'backport' --base r174 --milestone r174 --web

Or, if you don't have the GitHub CLI installed (we recommend you install it!):

# Push the branch to GitHub:
git push --set-upstream origin backport-4344-to-r174

# Create a pull request where the `base` branch is `r174` and the `compare`/`head` branch is `backport-4344-to-r174`.

# Remove the local backport branch
git switch main
git branch -D backport-4344-to-r174

joe-elliott added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2024
* remove trace ids

Signed-off-by: Joe Elliott <number101010@gmail.com>

* linear buckets

Signed-off-by: Joe Elliott <number101010@gmail.com>

* changelog

Signed-off-by: Joe Elliott <number101010@gmail.com>

* tuney tune

Signed-off-by: Joe Elliott <number101010@gmail.com>

* metric misses and increase pool size

Signed-off-by: Joe Elliott <number101010@gmail.com>

* lint

Signed-off-by: Joe Elliott <number101010@gmail.com>

---------

Signed-off-by: Joe Elliott <number101010@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit f71c4c6)
joe-elliott added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2024
* remove trace ids

Signed-off-by: Joe Elliott <number101010@gmail.com>

* linear buckets

Signed-off-by: Joe Elliott <number101010@gmail.com>

* changelog

Signed-off-by: Joe Elliott <number101010@gmail.com>

* tuney tune

Signed-off-by: Joe Elliott <number101010@gmail.com>

* metric misses and increase pool size

Signed-off-by: Joe Elliott <number101010@gmail.com>

* lint

Signed-off-by: Joe Elliott <number101010@gmail.com>

---------

Signed-off-by: Joe Elliott <number101010@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit f71c4c6)
@joe-elliott joe-elliott mentioned this pull request Nov 22, 2024
3 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants