Add more gl functions #317
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: sagudev <16504129+sagudev@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: sagudev <16504129+sagudev@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: sagudev <16504129+sagudev@users.noreply.github.com>
|
I will stop adding commits here as all remaining stuff that is missing for is less trivial to add. |
3 tasks
Signed-off-by: sagudev <16504129+sagudev@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: sagudev <16504129+sagudev@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: sagudev <16504129+sagudev@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: sagudev <16504129+sagudev@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: sagudev <16504129+sagudev@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: sagudev <16504129+sagudev@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: sagudev <16504129+sagudev@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: sagudev <16504129+sagudev@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: sagudev <16504129+sagudev@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: sagudev <16504129+sagudev@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: sagudev <16504129+sagudev@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: sagudev <16504129+sagudev@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: sagudev <16504129+sagudev@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: sagudev <16504129+sagudev@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: sagudev <16504129+sagudev@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: sagudev <16504129+sagudev@users.noreply.github.com>
|
@sagudev is this ready to review? |
Yes, all my PRs that are not marked as draft are ready to land. |
grovesNL
approved these changes
Nov 1, 2024
| @@ -433,6 +438,20 @@ impl HasContext for Context { | |||
| 1 == status | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| unsafe fn get_program_validate_status(&self, program: Self::Program) -> bool { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I guess we could've exposed get_program_parameter_bool, get_program_parameter_i32 (like you've added here), etc. instead of having these individual functions, but it's probably fine because there aren't too many anyway
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We should probably add get_program_parameter_bool and reuse these internally though (instead of having each of these repeating the status == 1), but we can do that in a follow-up PR
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Each commit is standalone.