-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
aws_mq_configuration revision increment not showing in plan #14842
Comments
The fix for this has been merged and will release with version 3.5.0 of the Terraform AWS Provider, later next week. Thanks to @ewbankkit for the implementation. 👍 |
This has been released in version 3.5.0 of the Terraform AWS provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading. For further feature requests or bug reports with this functionality, please create a new GitHub issue following the template for triage. Thanks! |
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. Thanks! |
Community Note
Terraform CLI and Terraform AWS Provider Version
Affected Resource(s)
Terraform Configuration Files
Expected Behavior
Terraform does not create a new aws_mq_configuration revision when only updating tags, OR
if AWS is who actually creates a new aws_mq_configuration revision when updating tags, then the provider must reflect that and show the revision increment.
Actual Behavior
A new aws_mq_configuration revision is created, despite the plan not showing it:
terraform apply
terraform apply
again, and we find revision was indeed incremented despite not being shown in previous planThis generates drift when referring this aws_mq_configuration in a aws_mq_broker resource, and even makes a
terraform apply -auto-approve
fail with error:Steps to Reproduce
terraform apply
Important Factoids
Same behaviour occurs using provider version 2.70.0
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: