Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

changelog: reflect the Kubernetes secret_suffix validation fix #35820

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 16, 2024
Merged

changelog: reflect the Kubernetes secret_suffix validation fix #35820

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
f9735f5
reflect the Kubernetes 'secret_suffix' validation fix
bschaatsbergen Oct 4, 2024
008cf4d
rephrase changelog entry
bschaatsbergen Oct 4, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions CHANGELOG.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ NEW FEATURES:

BUG FIXES:

- The `secret_suffix` in the `kubernetes` backend now includes validation to prevent errors when the `secret_suffix` ends with a number ([#35666](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform/pull/35666)).
- The error message for an invalid default value for an input variable now indicates when the problem is with a nested value in a complex data type. ([#35465](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform/issues/35465))
- Sensitive marks could be incorrectly transferred to nested resource values, causing erroneous changes during a plan ([#35501](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform/issues/35501))
- Allow unknown `error_message` values to pass the core validate step, so variable validation can be completed later during plan
Expand Down
Loading