From cba8832900201d22cfb624ba4e42084796014627 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: horo <143025439+horo-fox@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 18:37:08 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] filler

---
 src/content/journal/failing-loudly.md | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 src/content/journal/failing-loudly.md

diff --git a/src/content/journal/failing-loudly.md b/src/content/journal/failing-loudly.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d2e875b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/content/journal/failing-loudly.md
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+---
+title: "Things should fail loudly!"
+published: 4-1-2024
+summary: "A Python user talking about how they dislike JS"
+---
+
+I really don't like JavaScript's tendency to fail quietly. I understand the rationale: broken webpages are everywhere. But something about the pervasiveness of `undefined` just hurts me.
+
+Let's compare two possible approaches for handling external data:
+
+-   throwing it into an unstructured blob and going through that
+-   converting it via a schema
+
+JavaScript seems to go with the first. It sucks. Special syntax for property access, conveniences for unexpected data, type coersion, etc.
+
+I don't have much of a point beyond that, because I do have a soft spot for TypeScript. I don't hate JavaScript as much as I probably should, and I use it for projects and I am fine poking at it for frontend development. Heck, I think CSS is scarier! But I do dislike how JavaScript lets errors pass silently.