Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: support read_parquet for ms sql backend #9357

Closed
1 task done
ruiyang2015 opened this issue Jun 11, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed
1 task done

feat: support read_parquet for ms sql backend #9357

ruiyang2015 opened this issue Jun 11, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
feature Features or general enhancements

Comments

@ruiyang2015
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem?

getting this error:
NotImplementedError: mssql does not support direct registration of parquet data.

did not find any documentation for this feature not supported for ms sql,

What is the motivation behind your request?

i am trying to use ibis as a generic interface for different backend, and need use it to load parquet file to various backend. But encounter this error for ms sql.

Describe the solution you'd like

ibis implement this feature.

What version of ibis are you running?

9.0.0

What backend(s) are you using, if any?

mssql

Code of Conduct

  • I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct
@ruiyang2015 ruiyang2015 added the feature Features or general enhancements label Jun 11, 2024
@cpcloud
Copy link
Member

cpcloud commented Jun 12, 2024

@ruiyang2015 This would be interesting! I think we're unlikely to add support for this without a native MSSQL ADBC driver, given how horribly slow it would be otherwise.

@jcrist
Copy link
Member

jcrist commented Jun 26, 2024

Closing this in favor of the broader #9448.

@jcrist jcrist closed this as completed Jun 26, 2024
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from backlog to done in Ibis planning and roadmap Jun 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature Features or general enhancements
Projects
Archived in project
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants