Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Get right result of bbox using eval_mask_FPN code but wrong result of segmentation? #6

Open
JackHenry1992 opened this issue Apr 6, 2018 · 5 comments

Comments

@JackHenry1992
Copy link

JackHenry1992 commented Apr 6, 2018

Thanks for sharing your greate work.
I have tested your mask_rcnn_FPN code, and got the right result of bbox detecting, but wrong result of seg.
I have pasted the result of eval_mask_FPN AP as follows:

  1. bbox
    image
  2. seg

image

And the demo_mask_FPN also shows a wrong result as follows:

image

  1. Furthermore, I test the mask_rcnn_c4_2x-resnet50 model, and the result is same as yours.
    image

So is there something wrong with mask_rcnn_FPN ?

@ignacio-rocco
Copy link
Owner

Hi, which pretrained model are you using?
I'm using model 35861858 and it's working fine for me.

@JackHenry1992
Copy link
Author

JackHenry1992 commented Apr 10, 2018

Hi, @ignacio-rocco, I have tested these two models
image
and can't get the right result.
I just test the 35861858 model again, and also get the wrong semantic-mask result but right bbox.

@cherryxiongyw
Copy link

@JackHenry1992 Hi,do you solve the problem?When I run domo_FPN.ipynb,I got the same wrong result。

@ignacio-rocco
Copy link
Owner

Which python & pytorch version are you using?

@cherryxiongyw
Copy link

@ignacio-rocco python=3.5 pytorch = 0.3.1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants