We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
While doing some additional tests, I managed to create a case where the end result that used multiple index queries was not correct.
Merge-join processing has bugs.
Working on it, adding also some more tests also to verify more complex index merge scenarios.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Fix merge-join algorithm to correctly filter indexes, closes jaegertr…
2a3e3d1
…acing#1719 Signed-off-by: Michael Burman <yak@iki.fi>
baff4cb
Fix badger merge-join algorithm to correctly filter indexes (#1721)
ecdecd1
* Fix merge-join algorithm to correctly filter indexes, closes #1719 Signed-off-by: Michael Burman <yak@iki.fi> * Address comments Signed-off-by: Michael Burman <yak@iki.fi>
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Problem - what in Jaeger blocks you from solving the requirement?
While doing some additional tests, I managed to create a case where the end result that used multiple index queries was not correct.
Merge-join processing has bugs.
Proposal - what do you suggest to solve the problem or improve the existing situation?
Working on it, adding also some more tests also to verify more complex index merge scenarios.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: