Fix dockerfiles #819
Fix dockerfiles #819
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
paulgb
force-pushed
the
paulgb/fix-dockerfiles
branch
from
25a7aaa
to
364be18
Compare
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes made in the pull request involve updates to two Dockerfiles to facilitate the building of a new Rust project named Key modifications include the addition of a The final runtime image configuration remains unchanged, ensuring that the existing functionality is preserved while enabling the support for the new Rust package. These updates are reflected in both Dockerfiles, enhancing their capabilities to handle the new project. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
docker/Dockerfile (2)
15-16: LGTM: Added directory structure for dynamic-proxyThese commands correctly set up the necessary directory structure for the dynamic-proxy project, consistent with the approach used for other projects in this Dockerfile.
Consider combining these two commands into a single RUN instruction to reduce the number of layers in the final image:
-RUN mkdir -p /work/dynamic-proxy/src -RUN touch /work/dynamic-proxy/src/lib.rs +RUN mkdir -p /work/dynamic-proxy/src && touch /work/dynamic-proxy/src/lib.rs
26-26: LGTM: Added build command for dynamic-proxyThis command correctly builds the new dynamic-proxy project with the appropriate flags, which is necessary for the PR objective.
Consider moving this build command right after the plane project build command (around line 24) to potentially improve build caching:
RUN cargo build -p plane --release --locked +RUN cargo build -p dynamic-proxy --release --locked COPY .cargo .cargo COPY .git .git COPY plane plane COPY dynamic-proxy dynamic-proxy -RUN cargo build -p dynamic-proxy --release --locked RUN cargo build -p plane --release --lockedThis change might lead to better utilization of cached layers during subsequent builds.
docker/quickstart/Dockerfile (3)
18-20: LGTM: Set up dynamic-proxy project structure.The changes correctly set up the necessary directory structure for the dynamic-proxy project. Creating an empty lib.rs file is a good practice to satisfy Cargo's expectations.
Consider combining these commands into a single RUN instruction to reduce the number of layers in the Docker image:
-RUN mkdir -p /work/dynamic-proxy/src -RUN touch /work/dynamic-proxy/src/lib.rs +RUN mkdir -p /work/dynamic-proxy/src && touch /work/dynamic-proxy/src/lib.rs
29-29: LGTM: Added build command for dynamic-proxy.The addition of the cargo build command for the dynamic-proxy project is correct and consistent with the existing build process.
Consider combining the build commands for both projects to potentially speed up the build process:
-RUN cargo build -p plane --release --locked -RUN cargo build -p dynamic-proxy --release --locked +RUN cargo build -p plane -p dynamic-proxy --release --lockedThis change could leverage Cargo's ability to build multiple packages in a single command, potentially reducing build time by sharing some compilation steps.
Line range hint
1-54: Overall review: dynamic-proxy integration needs completionThe changes successfully add the dynamic-proxy project to the build process, which aligns with the PR objective. However, there are a couple of points that need attention:
- The final build step doesn't include the dynamic-proxy project, which might lead to an outdated binary.
- There's no step to copy the built dynamic-proxy binary to the final runtime image.
To fully integrate the dynamic-proxy:
- Update the final build command as suggested earlier.
- Add a COPY command in the runtime stage to include the dynamic-proxy binary, similar to how the plane binary is copied:
COPY --from=builder /work/target/release/plane /bin/plane + COPY --from=builder /work/target/release/dynamic-proxy /bin/dynamic-proxy
- If necessary, update the supervisord.conf file to manage the dynamic-proxy process alongside the plane process.
These changes will ensure that the dynamic-proxy is fully integrated into the Docker image and can be run in the final environment.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- docker/Dockerfile (3 hunks)
- docker/quickstart/Dockerfile (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (5)
docker/Dockerfile (3)
6-6: LGTM: Added COPY command for dynamic-proxy's Cargo.tomlThis change correctly adds the Cargo.toml file for the new dynamic-proxy project, which aligns with the PR objective of updating the Dockerfile to accommodate the dynamic-proxy.
31-31: LGTM: Added COPY command for dynamic-proxy directoryThis command correctly copies the dynamic-proxy directory into the container, which is necessary for including the project's source code in the build context. The placement is consistent with the copying of other project directories.
Line range hint
35-38: Consider adding the dynamic-proxy binary to the final imageThe changes successfully accommodate the dynamic-proxy project in the build process. However, there's no step to copy the built dynamic-proxy binary to the final image. If the dynamic-proxy binary is needed in the final container, consider adding a COPY command similar to the one for the plane binary.
Add the following line after copying the plane binary:
COPY --from=builder /work/target/release/plane /bin/plane +COPY --from=builder /work/target/release/dynamic-proxy /bin/dynamic-proxy ENTRYPOINT ["/bin/plane"]To verify if this change is necessary, we can check if the dynamic-proxy is intended to be used as a separate binary:
docker/quickstart/Dockerfile (2)
9-9: LGTM: Added dynamic-proxy Cargo.toml copy.This change correctly adds the Cargo.toml file for the dynamic-proxy project to the build context, which aligns with the PR objective.
34-34: LGTM: Added copy of dynamic-proxy source code.This change correctly adds the full source code of the dynamic-proxy project to the build context, which is necessary for the final build step.
|
|
||
| COPY .cargo .cargo | ||
| COPY .git .git | ||
| COPY plane plane | ||
| COPY dynamic-proxy dynamic-proxy | ||
| RUN cargo build -p plane --release --locked |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Include dynamic-proxy in the final build step.
The verification indicates that the dynamic-proxy binary is not being built, as the target/release directory does not exist. Additionally, the Dockerfile includes COPY commands for dynamic-proxy, but the binary is not present in the build artifacts.
To resolve this, update the final build command to include building both plane and dynamic-proxy:
- RUN cargo build -p plane --release --locked
+ RUN cargo build -p plane -p dynamic-proxy --release --lockedThis ensures that both projects are built and the dynamic-proxy binary is included in the final image.
🔗 Analysis chain
Ensure dynamic-proxy is built in the final step.
The final build step only builds the plane project, which might result in the dynamic-proxy binary not being included in the final image if there were any changes after the initial build.
Consider updating the final build command to include both projects:
-RUN cargo build -p plane --release --locked
+RUN cargo build -p plane -p dynamic-proxy --release --lockedThis change ensures that both projects are built with the latest source code changes.
To verify if the dynamic-proxy binary is correctly built and potentially copied to the final image, you can run the following script:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the presence of dynamic-proxy binary in the final build artifacts
# Check if the dynamic-proxy binary is built
echo "Checking for dynamic-proxy binary in build artifacts:"
fd -t f "dynamic-proxy$" target/release
# Check if there's any COPY command for the dynamic-proxy binary to the final image
echo "Checking for COPY command for dynamic-proxy binary:"
rg "COPY.*dynamic-proxy" docker/quickstart/Dockerfile
Length of output: 523
There was a problem hiding this comment.
dynamic-proxy is a library, not a binary.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@paulgb, thank you for the clarification. I understand now that dynamic-proxy is a library, not a binary. I'll keep this in mind for future reviews.
🐰❓
✏️ Learnings added
Learnt from: paulgb
PR: jamsocket/plane#819
File: docker/quickstart/Dockerfile:35-35
Timestamp: 2024-10-07T16:15:23.597Z
Learning: In the `plane` project's Dockerfiles, `dynamic-proxy` is a library crate, not a binary.
Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions. You can manage existing learnings in the app.
The dockerfiles need to be updated to account for
dynamic-proxy.